刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

    A group of Labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “town of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017, and has been awarded to Coventry for 2021. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in £220m of investment and an avalanche of arts, ought not to be confined to cities. Britain’s towns, it is true, are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bid to beat their bigger competitors. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

    Some might see the proposal as a booby prize for the fact that Britain is no longer able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Liverpool in 2008. A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itself for the post-Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows what will follow—village of culture? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culture?

    It is also wise to recall that such titles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and washes out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community. The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

    It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgow’s year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of a complex series of factors that have turned the city into the powerhouse of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

    A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiarities—helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilities and above all celebrating its people. Jeremy Wright, the culture secretary, should welcome this positive, hope-filled proposal, and turn it into action.

25. What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

A
Skeptical.
B
Objective.
C
Favorable.
D
Critical.
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

C

解析:

答案精析:本题为观点态度题。根据题文同序原则,可定位至原文最后一段。通读文章可知,前四段是对提案相关内容的客观描述,最后一段是作者对提案的看法。最后一段中,作者说到,“文化之镇”不仅仅只是关于艺术,还有助于维持当地商业文化的繁荣,根据原文中的honouring、helping、supporting和celebrating这类含有积极意义的词可知,作者对提案的态度是积极的、赞成的,因此选C。

错项排除:通过最后一段,可知作者的态度是积极的,因此含消极意义的A、D项可排除。在最后一段中,作者描述了提案的积极作用,并未涉及不足之处,文章第二段对提案的消极评价只是一些愤世嫉俗者的观点,并非作者的观点,因此B项排除。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:25. What is the author’s attitude towards the prop

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share