刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

    Will the European Union make it? The question would have sounded strange not long ago. Now even the project’s greatest cheerleaders talk of a continent facing a “Bermuda triangle” of debt, population decline and lower growth.

    As well as those chronic problems, the EU faces an acute crisis in its economic core, the 16 countries that use the single currency. Markets have lost faith that the euro zone’s economies, weaker or stronger, will one day converge thanks to the discipline of sharing a single currency, which denies uncompetitive members the quick fix of devaluation.

    Yet the debate about how to save Europe’s single currency from disintegration is stuck. It is stuck because the euro zone’s dominant powers, France and Germany, agree on the need for greater harmonisation within the euro zone, but disagree about what to harmonise.

    Germany thinks the euro must be saved by stricter rules on borrowing, spending and competitiveness, backed by quasi-automatic sanctions for governments that do not obey. These might include threats to freeze EU funds for poorer regions and EU mega-projects, and even the suspension of a country’s voting rights in EU ministerial councils. It insists that economic co-ordination should involve all 27 members of the EU club, among whom there is a small majority for free-market liberalism and economic rigour; in the inner core alone, Germany fears, a small majority favour French interference.

    A “southern” camp headed by French wants something different: “European economic government” within an inner core of euro-zone members. Translated, that means politicians intervening in monetary policy and a system of redistribution from richer to poorer members, via cheaper borrowing for governments through common Eurobonds or complete fiscal transfers. Finally, figures close to the France government have murmured, euro-zone members should agree to some fiscal and social harmonisation: e.g., curbing competition in corporate-tax rates or labor costs.

    It is too soon to write off the EU. It remains the world’s largest trading block. At its best, the European project is remarkably liberal: built around a single market of 27 rich and poor countries, its internal borders are far more open to goods, capital and labour than any comparable trading area. It is an ambitious attempt to blunt the sharpest edges of globalisation, and make capitalism benign.

40. Regarding the future of the EU, the author seems to feel ________.

A
pessimistic
B
desperate
C
conceited
D
hopeful
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

D

解析:

答案精析:第一段用设问的方式引出欧盟面临的各种问题;接下来作者从客观的角度叙述欧盟两大主导力量——法国和德国——各自提出的经济援助计划;最后一段表明作者的观点:欧盟的篇章还没有画上句点,依然是世界上最大的贸易体,这得益于它的政策,单一市场使得商品、资本和人力自由流通,是磨平全球化棱角、使资本主义健康发展的一次前瞻性的尝试。可知作者对欧盟单一市场的态度是积极并充满信心的,所以选D。

错项排除:A和B两项与最后一段表述矛盾,所以排除。C项一般用来形容人,而文章论述的主题是欧盟的未来,所以不能用在该语境中,故排除。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:40. Regarding the future of the EU, the author see

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share