一、Section Ⅰ Use of English
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
1、(1)
A、on
B、like
C、for
D、from
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
2、(2)
A、faith
B、concern
C、attention
D、interest
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
3、(3)
A、benefit
B、debt
C、hope
D、price
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
4、(4)
A、Therefore
B、Then
C、Instead
D、Again
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
5、(5)
A、Until
B、Unless
C、Although
D、When
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
6、(6)
A、selects
B、produces
C、applies
D、maintains
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
7、(7)
A、consult
B、compete
C、connect
D、compare
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
8、(8)
A、at
B、by
C、of
D、to
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
9、(9)
A、context
B、mood
C、period
D、circle
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
10、(10)
A、counterparts
B、substitutes
C、colleagues
D、supporters
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
11、(11)
A、Funny
B、Lucky
C、Odd
D、Ironic
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
12、(12)
A、monitor
B、protect
C、surprise
D、delight
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
13、(13)
A、between
B、within
C、toward
D、over
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
14、(14)
A、transferred
B、added
C、introduced
D、entrusted
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
15、(15)
A、out
B、back
C、around
D、inside
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
16、(16)
A、discovered
B、proved
C、insisted
D、remembered
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
17、(17)
A、betrayed
B、wronged
C、fooled
D、mocked
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
18、(18)
A、forced
B、willing
C、hesitant
D、entitled
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
19、(19)
A、In contrast
B、As a result
C、On the whole
D、For instance
Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a necessary condition (1)_____ many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On the other hand, putting your (2)_____ in the wrong place often carries a high (3)_____.
(4)_____, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. (5)_____ people place their trust in an individual or an institution, their brains release oxytocin, a hormone that (6)_____ pleasurable feelings and triggers the herding instinct that prompts humans to (7)_____ with one another. Scientists have found that exposure (8)_____ this hormone puts us in a trusting (9)_____ : In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin into the noses of half the subjects; those subjects were ready to lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were their (10)_____ who inhaled something else.
(11)_____ for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may (12)_____ us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can differentiate (13)_____ a credible person and a dishonest one. Sixty toddlers were each (14)_____ to an adult tester holding a plastic container. The tester would ask, “What’s in here?” before looking into the container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then invited to look (15)_____. Half of them found a toy; the other half (16)_____ the container was empty and realized the tester had (17)_____ them.
Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were (18)_____ to cooperate with the tester in learning a new skill, demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. (19)_____, only five of the 30 children paired with the (20)“ _____ ” tester participated in a follow-up activity.
20、(20)
A、inflexible
B、incapable
C、unreliable
D、unsuitable
二、Section Ⅱ Reading Comprehension
Among the annoying challenges facing the middle class is one that will probably go unmentioned in the next presidential campaign: What happens when the robots come for their jobs?
Don’t dismiss that possibility entirely. About half of U.S. jobs are at high risk of being automated, according to a University of Oxford study, with the middle class disproportionately squeezed. Lower-income jobs like gardening or day care don’t appeal to robots. But many middle-class occupations—trucking, financial advice, software engineering—have aroused their interest, or soon will. The rich own the robots, so they will be fine.
This isn’t to be alarmist. Optimists point out that technological upheaval has benefited workers in the past. The Industrial Revolution didn’t go so well for Luddites whose jobs were displaced by mechanized looms, but it eventually raised living standards and created more jobs than it destroyed. Likewise, automation should eventually boost productivity, stimulate demand by driving down prices, and free workers from hard, boring work. But in the medium term, middle-class workers may need a lot of help adjusting.
The first step, as Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee argue in The Second Machine Age, should be rethinking education and job training. Curriculums—from grammar school to college—should evolve to focus less on memorizing facts and more on creativity and complex communication. Vocational schools should do a better job of fostering problem-solving skills and helping students work alongside robots. Online education can supplement the traditional kind. It could make extra training and instruction affordable. Professionals trying to acquire new skills will be able to do so without going into debt.
The challenge of coping with automation underlines the need for the U.S. to revive its fading business dynamism: Starting new companies must be made easier. In previous eras of drastic technological change, entrepreneurs smoothed the transition by dreaming up ways to combine labor and machines. The best uses of 3D printers and virtual reality haven’t been invented yet. The U.S. needs the new companies that will invent them.
Finally, because automation threatens to widen the gap between capital income and labor income, taxes and the safety net will have to be rethought. Taxes on low-wage labor need to be cut, and wage subsidies such as the earned income tax credit should be expanded: This would boost incomes, encourage work, reward companies for job creation, and reduce inequality.
Technology will improve society in ways big and small over the next few years, yet this will be little comfort to those who find their lives and careers upended by automation. Destroying the machines that are coming for our jobs would be nuts. But policies to help workers adapt will be indispensable.
21、21. Who will be most threatened by automation?
A、Leading politicians.
B、Low-wage laborers.
C、Robot owners.
D、Middle-class workers.
Among the annoying challenges facing the middle class is one that will probably go unmentioned in the next presidential campaign: What happens when the robots come for their jobs?
Don’t dismiss that possibility entirely. About half of U.S. jobs are at high risk of being automated, according to a University of Oxford study, with the middle class disproportionately squeezed. Lower-income jobs like gardening or day care don’t appeal to robots. But many middle-class occupations—trucking, financial advice, software engineering—have aroused their interest, or soon will. The rich own the robots, so they will be fine.
This isn’t to be alarmist. Optimists point out that technological upheaval has benefited workers in the past. The Industrial Revolution didn’t go so well for Luddites whose jobs were displaced by mechanized looms, but it eventually raised living standards and created more jobs than it destroyed. Likewise, automation should eventually boost productivity, stimulate demand by driving down prices, and free workers from hard, boring work. But in the medium term, middle-class workers may need a lot of help adjusting.
The first step, as Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee argue in The Second Machine Age, should be rethinking education and job training. Curriculums—from grammar school to college—should evolve to focus less on memorizing facts and more on creativity and complex communication. Vocational schools should do a better job of fostering problem-solving skills and helping students work alongside robots. Online education can supplement the traditional kind. It could make extra training and instruction affordable. Professionals trying to acquire new skills will be able to do so without going into debt.
The challenge of coping with automation underlines the need for the U.S. to revive its fading business dynamism: Starting new companies must be made easier. In previous eras of drastic technological change, entrepreneurs smoothed the transition by dreaming up ways to combine labor and machines. The best uses of 3D printers and virtual reality haven’t been invented yet. The U.S. needs the new companies that will invent them.
Finally, because automation threatens to widen the gap between capital income and labor income, taxes and the safety net will have to be rethought. Taxes on low-wage labor need to be cut, and wage subsidies such as the earned income tax credit should be expanded: This would boost incomes, encourage work, reward companies for job creation, and reduce inequality.
Technology will improve society in ways big and small over the next few years, yet this will be little comfort to those who find their lives and careers upended by automation. Destroying the machines that are coming for our jobs would be nuts. But policies to help workers adapt will be indispensable.
22、22. Which of the following best represent the author’s view?
A、Worries about automation are in fact groundless.
B、Optimists’ opinions on new tech find little support.
C、Issues arising from automation need to be tackled.
D、Negative consequences of new tech can be avoided.
Among the annoying challenges facing the middle class is one that will probably go unmentioned in the next presidential campaign: What happens when the robots come for their jobs?
Don’t dismiss that possibility entirely. About half of U.S. jobs are at high risk of being automated, according to a University of Oxford study, with the middle class disproportionately squeezed. Lower-income jobs like gardening or day care don’t appeal to robots. But many middle-class occupations—trucking, financial advice, software engineering—have aroused their interest, or soon will. The rich own the robots, so they will be fine.
This isn’t to be alarmist. Optimists point out that technological upheaval has benefited workers in the past. The Industrial Revolution didn’t go so well for Luddites whose jobs were displaced by mechanized looms, but it eventually raised living standards and created more jobs than it destroyed. Likewise, automation should eventually boost productivity, stimulate demand by driving down prices, and free workers from hard, boring work. But in the medium term, middle-class workers may need a lot of help adjusting.
The first step, as Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee argue in The Second Machine Age, should be rethinking education and job training. Curriculums—from grammar school to college—should evolve to focus less on memorizing facts and more on creativity and complex communication. Vocational schools should do a better job of fostering problem-solving skills and helping students work alongside robots. Online education can supplement the traditional kind. It could make extra training and instruction affordable. Professionals trying to acquire new skills will be able to do so without going into debt.
The challenge of coping with automation underlines the need for the U.S. to revive its fading business dynamism: Starting new companies must be made easier. In previous eras of drastic technological change, entrepreneurs smoothed the transition by dreaming up ways to combine labor and machines. The best uses of 3D printers and virtual reality haven’t been invented yet. The U.S. needs the new companies that will invent them.
Finally, because automation threatens to widen the gap between capital income and labor income, taxes and the safety net will have to be rethought. Taxes on low-wage labor need to be cut, and wage subsidies such as the earned income tax credit should be expanded: This would boost incomes, encourage work, reward companies for job creation, and reduce inequality.
Technology will improve society in ways big and small over the next few years, yet this will be little comfort to those who find their lives and careers upended by automation. Destroying the machines that are coming for our jobs would be nuts. But policies to help workers adapt will be indispensable.
23、23. Education in the age of automation should put more emphasis on ________.
A、creative potential
B、job-hunting skills
C、individual needs
D、cooperative spirit
Among the annoying challenges facing the middle class is one that will probably go unmentioned in the next presidential campaign: What happens when the robots come for their jobs?
Don’t dismiss that possibility entirely. About half of U.S. jobs are at high risk of being automated, according to a University of Oxford study, with the middle class disproportionately squeezed. Lower-income jobs like gardening or day care don’t appeal to robots. But many middle-class occupations—trucking, financial advice, software engineering—have aroused their interest, or soon will. The rich own the robots, so they will be fine.
This isn’t to be alarmist. Optimists point out that technological upheaval has benefited workers in the past. The Industrial Revolution didn’t go so well for Luddites whose jobs were displaced by mechanized looms, but it eventually raised living standards and created more jobs than it destroyed. Likewise, automation should eventually boost productivity, stimulate demand by driving down prices, and free workers from hard, boring work. But in the medium term, middle-class workers may need a lot of help adjusting.
The first step, as Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee argue in The Second Machine Age, should be rethinking education and job training. Curriculums—from grammar school to college—should evolve to focus less on memorizing facts and more on creativity and complex communication. Vocational schools should do a better job of fostering problem-solving skills and helping students work alongside robots. Online education can supplement the traditional kind. It could make extra training and instruction affordable. Professionals trying to acquire new skills will be able to do so without going into debt.
The challenge of coping with automation underlines the need for the U.S. to revive its fading business dynamism: Starting new companies must be made easier. In previous eras of drastic technological change, entrepreneurs smoothed the transition by dreaming up ways to combine labor and machines. The best uses of 3D printers and virtual reality haven’t been invented yet. The U.S. needs the new companies that will invent them.
Finally, because automation threatens to widen the gap between capital income and labor income, taxes and the safety net will have to be rethought. Taxes on low-wage labor need to be cut, and wage subsidies such as the earned income tax credit should be expanded: This would boost incomes, encourage work, reward companies for job creation, and reduce inequality.
Technology will improve society in ways big and small over the next few years, yet this will be little comfort to those who find their lives and careers upended by automation. Destroying the machines that are coming for our jobs would be nuts. But policies to help workers adapt will be indispensable.
24、24. The author suggests that tax policies be aimed at ________.
A、encouraging the development of automation
B、increasing the return on capital investment
C、easing the hostility between rich and poor
D、preventing the income gap from widening
Among the annoying challenges facing the middle class is one that will probably go unmentioned in the next presidential campaign: What happens when the robots come for their jobs?
Don’t dismiss that possibility entirely. About half of U.S. jobs are at high risk of being automated, according to a University of Oxford study, with the middle class disproportionately squeezed. Lower-income jobs like gardening or day care don’t appeal to robots. But many middle-class occupations—trucking, financial advice, software engineering—have aroused their interest, or soon will. The rich own the robots, so they will be fine.
This isn’t to be alarmist. Optimists point out that technological upheaval has benefited workers in the past. The Industrial Revolution didn’t go so well for Luddites whose jobs were displaced by mechanized looms, but it eventually raised living standards and created more jobs than it destroyed. Likewise, automation should eventually boost productivity, stimulate demand by driving down prices, and free workers from hard, boring work. But in the medium term, middle-class workers may need a lot of help adjusting.
The first step, as Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee argue in The Second Machine Age, should be rethinking education and job training. Curriculums—from grammar school to college—should evolve to focus less on memorizing facts and more on creativity and complex communication. Vocational schools should do a better job of fostering problem-solving skills and helping students work alongside robots. Online education can supplement the traditional kind. It could make extra training and instruction affordable. Professionals trying to acquire new skills will be able to do so without going into debt.
The challenge of coping with automation underlines the need for the U.S. to revive its fading business dynamism: Starting new companies must be made easier. In previous eras of drastic technological change, entrepreneurs smoothed the transition by dreaming up ways to combine labor and machines. The best uses of 3D printers and virtual reality haven’t been invented yet. The U.S. needs the new companies that will invent them.
Finally, because automation threatens to widen the gap between capital income and labor income, taxes and the safety net will have to be rethought. Taxes on low-wage labor need to be cut, and wage subsidies such as the earned income tax credit should be expanded: This would boost incomes, encourage work, reward companies for job creation, and reduce inequality.
Technology will improve society in ways big and small over the next few years, yet this will be little comfort to those who find their lives and careers upended by automation. Destroying the machines that are coming for our jobs would be nuts. But policies to help workers adapt will be indispensable.
25、25. In this text, the author presents a problem with ________.
A、opposing views on it
B、possible solutions to it
C、its alarming impacts
D、its major variations
A new survey by Harvard University finds more than two-thirds of young Americans disapprove of President Trump’s use of Twitter. The implication is that Millennials prefer news from the White House to be filtered through other source, not a president’s social media platform.
Most Americans rely on social media to check daily headlines. Yet as distrust has risen toward all media, people may be starting to beef up their media literacy skills. Such a trend is badly needed. During the 2016 presidential campaign, nearly a quarter of web content shared by Twitter users in the politically critical state of Michigan was fake news, according to the University of Oxford. And a survey conducted for BuzzFeed News found 44 percent of Facebook users rarely or never trust news from the media giant.
Young people who are digital natives are indeed becoming more skillful at separating fact from fiction in cyberspace. A Knight Foundation focus-group survey of young people between ages 14 and 24 found they use “distributed trust” to verify stories. They cross-check sources and prefer news from different perspectives—especially those that are open about any bias. “Many young people assume a great deal of personal responsibility for educating themselves and actively seeking out opposing viewpoints,” the survey concluded.
Such active research can have another effect. A 2014 survey conducted in Australia, Britain, and the United States by the University of Wisconsin-Madison found that young people’s reliance on social media led to greater political engagement.
Social media allows users to experience news events more intimately and immediately while also permitting them to re-share news as a projection of their values and interests. This forces users to be more conscious of their role in passing along information. A survey by Barna research group found the top reason given by Americans for the fake news phenomenon is “reader error,” more so than made-up stories or factual mistakes in reporting. About a third say the problem of fake news lies in “misinterpretation or exaggeration of actual news” via social media. In other words, the choice to share news on social media may be the heart of the issue. “This indicates there is a real personal responsibility in counteracting this problem,” says Roxanne Stone, editor in chief at Barna Group.
So when young people are critical of an over-tweeting president, they reveal a mental discipline in thinking skills—and in their choices on when to share on social media.
26、26. According to the Paragraphs 1 and 2, many young Americans cast doubts on ________.
A、the justification of the news-filtering practice
B、people’s preference for social media platforms
C、the administration’s ability to handle information
D、social media was a reliable source of news
A new survey by Harvard University finds more than two-thirds of young Americans disapprove of President Trump’s use of Twitter. The implication is that Millennials prefer news from the White House to be filtered through other source, not a president’s social media platform.
Most Americans rely on social media to check daily headlines. Yet as distrust has risen toward all media, people may be starting to beef up their media literacy skills. Such a trend is badly needed. During the 2016 presidential campaign, nearly a quarter of web content shared by Twitter users in the politically critical state of Michigan was fake news, according to the University of Oxford. And a survey conducted for BuzzFeed News found 44 percent of Facebook users rarely or never trust news from the media giant.
Young people who are digital natives are indeed becoming more skillful at separating fact from fiction in cyberspace. A Knight Foundation focus-group survey of young people between ages 14 and 24 found they use “distributed trust” to verify stories. They cross-check sources and prefer news from different perspectives—especially those that are open about any bias. “Many young people assume a great deal of personal responsibility for educating themselves and actively seeking out opposing viewpoints,” the survey concluded.
Such active research can have another effect. A 2014 survey conducted in Australia, Britain, and the United States by the University of Wisconsin-Madison found that young people’s reliance on social media led to greater political engagement.
Social media allows users to experience news events more intimately and immediately while also permitting them to re-share news as a projection of their values and interests. This forces users to be more conscious of their role in passing along information. A survey by Barna research group found the top reason given by Americans for the fake news phenomenon is “reader error,” more so than made-up stories or factual mistakes in reporting. About a third say the problem of fake news lies in “misinterpretation or exaggeration of actual news” via social media. In other words, the choice to share news on social media may be the heart of the issue. “This indicates there is a real personal responsibility in counteracting this problem,” says Roxanne Stone, editor in chief at Barna Group.
So when young people are critical of an over-tweeting president, they reveal a mental discipline in thinking skills—and in their choices on when to share on social media.
27、27. The phrase “beef up” (Para. 2) is closest in meaning to ________.
A、sharpen
B、define
C、boast
D、share
A new survey by Harvard University finds more than two-thirds of young Americans disapprove of President Trump’s use of Twitter. The implication is that Millennials prefer news from the White House to be filtered through other source, not a president’s social media platform.
Most Americans rely on social media to check daily headlines. Yet as distrust has risen toward all media, people may be starting to beef up their media literacy skills. Such a trend is badly needed. During the 2016 presidential campaign, nearly a quarter of web content shared by Twitter users in the politically critical state of Michigan was fake news, according to the University of Oxford. And a survey conducted for BuzzFeed News found 44 percent of Facebook users rarely or never trust news from the media giant.
Young people who are digital natives are indeed becoming more skillful at separating fact from fiction in cyberspace. A Knight Foundation focus-group survey of young people between ages 14 and 24 found they use “distributed trust” to verify stories. They cross-check sources and prefer news from different perspectives—especially those that are open about any bias. “Many young people assume a great deal of personal responsibility for educating themselves and actively seeking out opposing viewpoints,” the survey concluded.
Such active research can have another effect. A 2014 survey conducted in Australia, Britain, and the United States by the University of Wisconsin-Madison found that young people’s reliance on social media led to greater political engagement.
Social media allows users to experience news events more intimately and immediately while also permitting them to re-share news as a projection of their values and interests. This forces users to be more conscious of their role in passing along information. A survey by Barna research group found the top reason given by Americans for the fake news phenomenon is “reader error,” more so than made-up stories or factual mistakes in reporting. About a third say the problem of fake news lies in “misinterpretation or exaggeration of actual news” via social media. In other words, the choice to share news on social media may be the heart of the issue. “This indicates there is a real personal responsibility in counteracting this problem,” says Roxanne Stone, editor in chief at Barna Group.
So when young people are critical of an over-tweeting president, they reveal a mental discipline in thinking skills—and in their choices on when to share on social media.
28、28. According to the Knight Foundation survey, young people ________.
A、tend to voice their opinions in cyberspace
B、verify news by referring to diverse resources
C、have a strong sense of responsibility
D、like to exchange views on “distributed trust”
A new survey by Harvard University finds more than two-thirds of young Americans disapprove of President Trump’s use of Twitter. The implication is that Millennials prefer news from the White House to be filtered through other source, not a president’s social media platform.
Most Americans rely on social media to check daily headlines. Yet as distrust has risen toward all media, people may be starting to beef up their media literacy skills. Such a trend is badly needed. During the 2016 presidential campaign, nearly a quarter of web content shared by Twitter users in the politically critical state of Michigan was fake news, according to the University of Oxford. And a survey conducted for BuzzFeed News found 44 percent of Facebook users rarely or never trust news from the media giant.
Young people who are digital natives are indeed becoming more skillful at separating fact from fiction in cyberspace. A Knight Foundation focus-group survey of young people between ages 14 and 24 found they use “distributed trust” to verify stories. They cross-check sources and prefer news from different perspectives—especially those that are open about any bias. “Many young people assume a great deal of personal responsibility for educating themselves and actively seeking out opposing viewpoints,” the survey concluded.
Such active research can have another effect. A 2014 survey conducted in Australia, Britain, and the United States by the University of Wisconsin-Madison found that young people’s reliance on social media led to greater political engagement.
Social media allows users to experience news events more intimately and immediately while also permitting them to re-share news as a projection of their values and interests. This forces users to be more conscious of their role in passing along information. A survey by Barna research group found the top reason given by Americans for the fake news phenomenon is “reader error,” more so than made-up stories or factual mistakes in reporting. About a third say the problem of fake news lies in “misinterpretation or exaggeration of actual news” via social media. In other words, the choice to share news on social media may be the heart of the issue. “This indicates there is a real personal responsibility in counteracting this problem,” says Roxanne Stone, editor in chief at Barna Group.
So when young people are critical of an over-tweeting president, they reveal a mental discipline in thinking skills—and in their choices on when to share on social media.
29、29. The Barna survey found that a main cause for the fake news problem is ________.
A、readers’ outdated values
B、journalists’ biased reporting
C、readers’ misinterpretation
D、journalists’ made-up stories
A new survey by Harvard University finds more than two-thirds of young Americans disapprove of President Trump’s use of Twitter. The implication is that Millennials prefer news from the White House to be filtered through other source, not a president’s social media platform.
Most Americans rely on social media to check daily headlines. Yet as distrust has risen toward all media, people may be starting to beef up their media literacy skills. Such a trend is badly needed. During the 2016 presidential campaign, nearly a quarter of web content shared by Twitter users in the politically critical state of Michigan was fake news, according to the University of Oxford. And a survey conducted for BuzzFeed News found 44 percent of Facebook users rarely or never trust news from the media giant.
Young people who are digital natives are indeed becoming more skillful at separating fact from fiction in cyberspace. A Knight Foundation focus-group survey of young people between ages 14 and 24 found they use “distributed trust” to verify stories. They cross-check sources and prefer news from different perspectives—especially those that are open about any bias. “Many young people assume a great deal of personal responsibility for educating themselves and actively seeking out opposing viewpoints,” the survey concluded.
Such active research can have another effect. A 2014 survey conducted in Australia, Britain, and the United States by the University of Wisconsin-Madison found that young people’s reliance on social media led to greater political engagement.
Social media allows users to experience news events more intimately and immediately while also permitting them to re-share news as a projection of their values and interests. This forces users to be more conscious of their role in passing along information. A survey by Barna research group found the top reason given by Americans for the fake news phenomenon is “reader error,” more so than made-up stories or factual mistakes in reporting. About a third say the problem of fake news lies in “misinterpretation or exaggeration of actual news” via social media. In other words, the choice to share news on social media may be the heart of the issue. “This indicates there is a real personal responsibility in counteracting this problem,” says Roxanne Stone, editor in chief at Barna Group.
So when young people are critical of an over-tweeting president, they reveal a mental discipline in thinking skills—and in their choices on when to share on social media.
30、30. Which of the following would be the best title for the text?
A、A Rise in Critical Skills for Sharing News Online
B、A Counteraction Against the Over-tweeting Trend
C、The Accumulation of Mutual Trust on Social Media
D、The Platforms for Projection of Personal Interests
Any fair-minded assessment of the dangers of the deal between Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) and DeepMind must start by acknowledging that both sides mean well. DeepMind is one of the leading artificial intelligence (AI) companies in the world. The potential of this work applied to healthcare is very great, but it could also lead to further concentration of power in the tech giants. It is against that background that the information commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, has issued her damning verdict against the Royal Free hospital trust under the NHS, which handed over to DeepMind the records of 1.6 million patients in 2015 on the basis of a vague agreement which took far too little account of the patients’ rights and their expectations of privacy.
DeepMind has almost apologized. The NHS trust has mended its ways. Further arrangements—and there may be many—between the NHS and DeepMind will be carefully scrutinised to ensure that all necessary permissions have been asked of patients and all unnecessary data has been cleaned. There are lessons about informed patient consent to learn. But privacy is not the only angle in this case and not even the most important. Ms Denham chose to concentrate the blame on the NHS trust, since under existing law it “controlled” the data and DeepMind merely “processed” it. But this distinction misses the point that it is processing and aggregation, not the mere possession of bits, that gives the data value.
The great question is who should benefit from the analysis of all the data that our lives now generate. Privacy law builds on the concept of damage to an individual from identifiable knowledge about them. That misses the way the surveillance economy works. The data of an individual there gains its value only when it is compared with the data of countless millions more.
The use of privacy law to curb the tech giants in this instance feels slightly maladapted. This practice does not address the real worry. It is not enough to say that the algorithms DeepMind develops will benefit patients and save lives. What matters is that they will belong to a private monopoly which developed them using public resources. If software promises to save lives on the scale that drugs now can, big data may be expected to behave as a big pharm has done. We are still at the beginning of this revolution and small choices now may turn out to have gigantic consequences later. A long struggle will be needed to avoid a future of digital feudalism. Ms Denham’s report is a welcome start.
31、31. What is true of the agreement between the NHS and DeepMind?
A、It caused conflicts among tech giants.
B、It failed to pay due attention to patient’s rights.
C、It fell short of the latter’s expectations.
D、It put both sides into a dangerous situation.
Any fair-minded assessment of the dangers of the deal between Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) and DeepMind must start by acknowledging that both sides mean well. DeepMind is one of the leading artificial intelligence (AI) companies in the world. The potential of this work applied to healthcare is very great, but it could also lead to further concentration of power in the tech giants. It is against that background that the information commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, has issued her damning verdict against the Royal Free hospital trust under the NHS, which handed over to DeepMind the records of 1.6 million patients in 2015 on the basis of a vague agreement which took far too little account of the patients’ rights and their expectations of privacy.
DeepMind has almost apologized. The NHS trust has mended its ways. Further arrangements—and there may be many—between the NHS and DeepMind will be carefully scrutinised to ensure that all necessary permissions have been asked of patients and all unnecessary data has been cleaned. There are lessons about informed patient consent to learn. But privacy is not the only angle in this case and not even the most important. Ms Denham chose to concentrate the blame on the NHS trust, since under existing law it “controlled” the data and DeepMind merely “processed” it. But this distinction misses the point that it is processing and aggregation, not the mere possession of bits, that gives the data value.
The great question is who should benefit from the analysis of all the data that our lives now generate. Privacy law builds on the concept of damage to an individual from identifiable knowledge about them. That misses the way the surveillance economy works. The data of an individual there gains its value only when it is compared with the data of countless millions more.
The use of privacy law to curb the tech giants in this instance feels slightly maladapted. This practice does not address the real worry. It is not enough to say that the algorithms DeepMind develops will benefit patients and save lives. What matters is that they will belong to a private monopoly which developed them using public resources. If software promises to save lives on the scale that drugs now can, big data may be expected to behave as a big pharm has done. We are still at the beginning of this revolution and small choices now may turn out to have gigantic consequences later. A long struggle will be needed to avoid a future of digital feudalism. Ms Denham’s report is a welcome start.
32、32. The NHS trust responded to Denham’s verdict with ________.
A、empty promises
B、tough resistance
C、necessary adjustments
D、sincere apologies
Any fair-minded assessment of the dangers of the deal between Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) and DeepMind must start by acknowledging that both sides mean well. DeepMind is one of the leading artificial intelligence (AI) companies in the world. The potential of this work applied to healthcare is very great, but it could also lead to further concentration of power in the tech giants. It is against that background that the information commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, has issued her damning verdict against the Royal Free hospital trust under the NHS, which handed over to DeepMind the records of 1.6 million patients in 2015 on the basis of a vague agreement which took far too little account of the patients’ rights and their expectations of privacy.
DeepMind has almost apologized. The NHS trust has mended its ways. Further arrangements—and there may be many—between the NHS and DeepMind will be carefully scrutinised to ensure that all necessary permissions have been asked of patients and all unnecessary data has been cleaned. There are lessons about informed patient consent to learn. But privacy is not the only angle in this case and not even the most important. Ms Denham chose to concentrate the blame on the NHS trust, since under existing law it “controlled” the data and DeepMind merely “processed” it. But this distinction misses the point that it is processing and aggregation, not the mere possession of bits, that gives the data value.
The great question is who should benefit from the analysis of all the data that our lives now generate. Privacy law builds on the concept of damage to an individual from identifiable knowledge about them. That misses the way the surveillance economy works. The data of an individual there gains its value only when it is compared with the data of countless millions more.
The use of privacy law to curb the tech giants in this instance feels slightly maladapted. This practice does not address the real worry. It is not enough to say that the algorithms DeepMind develops will benefit patients and save lives. What matters is that they will belong to a private monopoly which developed them using public resources. If software promises to save lives on the scale that drugs now can, big data may be expected to behave as a big pharm has done. We are still at the beginning of this revolution and small choices now may turn out to have gigantic consequences later. A long struggle will be needed to avoid a future of digital feudalism. Ms Denham’s report is a welcome start.
33、33. The author argues in Paragraph 2 that ________.
A、privacy protection must be secured at all costs
B、leaking patients’ data is worse than selling it
C、making profits from patients’ data is illegal
D、the value of data comes from the processing of it
Any fair-minded assessment of the dangers of the deal between Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) and DeepMind must start by acknowledging that both sides mean well. DeepMind is one of the leading artificial intelligence (AI) companies in the world. The potential of this work applied to healthcare is very great, but it could also lead to further concentration of power in the tech giants. It is against that background that the information commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, has issued her damning verdict against the Royal Free hospital trust under the NHS, which handed over to DeepMind the records of 1.6 million patients in 2015 on the basis of a vague agreement which took far too little account of the patients’ rights and their expectations of privacy.
DeepMind has almost apologized. The NHS trust has mended its ways. Further arrangements—and there may be many—between the NHS and DeepMind will be carefully scrutinised to ensure that all necessary permissions have been asked of patients and all unnecessary data has been cleaned. There are lessons about informed patient consent to learn. But privacy is not the only angle in this case and not even the most important. Ms Denham chose to concentrate the blame on the NHS trust, since under existing law it “controlled” the data and DeepMind merely “processed” it. But this distinction misses the point that it is processing and aggregation, not the mere possession of bits, that gives the data value.
The great question is who should benefit from the analysis of all the data that our lives now generate. Privacy law builds on the concept of damage to an individual from identifiable knowledge about them. That misses the way the surveillance economy works. The data of an individual there gains its value only when it is compared with the data of countless millions more.
The use of privacy law to curb the tech giants in this instance feels slightly maladapted. This practice does not address the real worry. It is not enough to say that the algorithms DeepMind develops will benefit patients and save lives. What matters is that they will belong to a private monopoly which developed them using public resources. If software promises to save lives on the scale that drugs now can, big data may be expected to behave as a big pharm has done. We are still at the beginning of this revolution and small choices now may turn out to have gigantic consequences later. A long struggle will be needed to avoid a future of digital feudalism. Ms Denham’s report is a welcome start.
34、34. According to the last paragraph, the real worry arising from this deal is ________.
A、the vicious rivalry among big pharms
B、the ineffective enforcement of privacy law
C、the uncontrolled use of new software
D、the monopoly of big data by tech giants
Any fair-minded assessment of the dangers of the deal between Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) and DeepMind must start by acknowledging that both sides mean well. DeepMind is one of the leading artificial intelligence (AI) companies in the world. The potential of this work applied to healthcare is very great, but it could also lead to further concentration of power in the tech giants. It is against that background that the information commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, has issued her damning verdict against the Royal Free hospital trust under the NHS, which handed over to DeepMind the records of 1.6 million patients in 2015 on the basis of a vague agreement which took far too little account of the patients’ rights and their expectations of privacy.
DeepMind has almost apologized. The NHS trust has mended its ways. Further arrangements—and there may be many—between the NHS and DeepMind will be carefully scrutinised to ensure that all necessary permissions have been asked of patients and all unnecessary data has been cleaned. There are lessons about informed patient consent to learn. But privacy is not the only angle in this case and not even the most important. Ms Denham chose to concentrate the blame on the NHS trust, since under existing law it “controlled” the data and DeepMind merely “processed” it. But this distinction misses the point that it is processing and aggregation, not the mere possession of bits, that gives the data value.
The great question is who should benefit from the analysis of all the data that our lives now generate. Privacy law builds on the concept of damage to an individual from identifiable knowledge about them. That misses the way the surveillance economy works. The data of an individual there gains its value only when it is compared with the data of countless millions more.
The use of privacy law to curb the tech giants in this instance feels slightly maladapted. This practice does not address the real worry. It is not enough to say that the algorithms DeepMind develops will benefit patients and save lives. What matters is that they will belong to a private monopoly which developed them using public resources. If software promises to save lives on the scale that drugs now can, big data may be expected to behave as a big pharm has done. We are still at the beginning of this revolution and small choices now may turn out to have gigantic consequences later. A long struggle will be needed to avoid a future of digital feudalism. Ms Denham’s report is a welcome start.
35、35. The author’s attitude toward the application of AI to healthcare is ________.
A、ambiguous
B、cautious
C、appreciative
D、contemptuous
The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) continues to bleed red ink. It reported a net loss of $5.6 billion for fiscal 2016, the 10th straight year its expenses have exceeded revenue. Meanwhile, it has more than $120 billion in unfunded liabilities, mostly for employee health and retirement costs. There are many bankruptcies. Fundamentally, the USPS is in a historic squeeze between technological change that has permanently decreased demand for its bread-and-butter product, first-class mail, and a regulatory structure that denies management the flexibility to adjust its operations to the new reality.
And interest groups ranging from postal unions to greeting-card makers exert self-interested pressure on the USPS’s ultimate overseer—Congress—insisting that whatever else happens to the Postal Service, aspects of the status quo they depend on get protected. This is why repeated attempts at reform legislation have failed in recent years, leaving the Postal Service unable to pay its bills except by deferring vital modernization.
Now comes word that everyone involved—Democrats, Republicans, the Postal Service, the unions and the system’s heaviest users—has finally agreed on a plan to fix the system. Legislation is moving through the House that would save USPS an estimated $28.6 billion over five years, which could help pay for new vehicles, among other survival measures. Most of the money would come from a penny-per-letter permanent rate increase and from shifting postal retirees into Medicare. The latter step would largely offset the financial burden of annually pre-funding retiree health care, thus addressing a long-standing complaint by the USPS and its unions.
If it clears the House, this measure would still have to get through the Senate—where someone is bound to point out that it amounts to the bare, bare minimum necessary to keep the Postal Service afloat, not comprehensive reform. There’s no change to collective bargaining at the USPS, a major omission considering that personnel accounts for 80 percent of the agency’s costs. Also missing is any discussion of eliminating Saturday letter delivery. That common-sense change enjoys wide public support and would save the USPS $2 billion per year. But postal special-interest groups seem to have killed it, at least in the House. The emerging consensus around the bill is a sign that legislators are getting frightened about a politically embarrassing short-term collapse at the USPS. It is not, however, a sign that they’re getting serious about transforming the postal system for the 21st century.
36、36. The financial problem with the USPS is caused partly by ________.
A、its unbalanced budget
B、its rigid management
C、the cost for technical upgrading
D、the withdrawal of bank support
The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) continues to bleed red ink. It reported a net loss of $5.6 billion for fiscal 2016, the 10th straight year its expenses have exceeded revenue. Meanwhile, it has more than $120 billion in unfunded liabilities, mostly for employee health and retirement costs. There are many bankruptcies. Fundamentally, the USPS is in a historic squeeze between technological change that has permanently decreased demand for its bread-and-butter product, first-class mail, and a regulatory structure that denies management the flexibility to adjust its operations to the new reality.
And interest groups ranging from postal unions to greeting-card makers exert self-interested pressure on the USPS’s ultimate overseer—Congress—insisting that whatever else happens to the Postal Service, aspects of the status quo they depend on get protected. This is why repeated attempts at reform legislation have failed in recent years, leaving the Postal Service unable to pay its bills except by deferring vital modernization.
Now comes word that everyone involved—Democrats, Republicans, the Postal Service, the unions and the system’s heaviest users—has finally agreed on a plan to fix the system. Legislation is moving through the House that would save USPS an estimated $28.6 billion over five years, which could help pay for new vehicles, among other survival measures. Most of the money would come from a penny-per-letter permanent rate increase and from shifting postal retirees into Medicare. The latter step would largely offset the financial burden of annually pre-funding retiree health care, thus addressing a long-standing complaint by the USPS and its unions.
If it clears the House, this measure would still have to get through the Senate—where someone is bound to point out that it amounts to the bare, bare minimum necessary to keep the Postal Service afloat, not comprehensive reform. There’s no change to collective bargaining at the USPS, a major omission considering that personnel accounts for 80 percent of the agency’s costs. Also missing is any discussion of eliminating Saturday letter delivery. That common-sense change enjoys wide public support and would save the USPS $2 billion per year. But postal special-interest groups seem to have killed it, at least in the House. The emerging consensus around the bill is a sign that legislators are getting frightened about a politically embarrassing short-term collapse at the USPS. It is not, however, a sign that they’re getting serious about transforming the postal system for the 21st century.
37、37. According to Paragraph 2, the USPS fails to modernize itself due to ________.
A、the interference from interest groups
B、the inadequate funding from Congress
C、the shrinking demand for postal service
D、the incompetence of postal unions
The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) continues to bleed red ink. It reported a net loss of $5.6 billion for fiscal 2016, the 10th straight year its expenses have exceeded revenue. Meanwhile, it has more than $120 billion in unfunded liabilities, mostly for employee health and retirement costs. There are many bankruptcies. Fundamentally, the USPS is in a historic squeeze between technological change that has permanently decreased demand for its bread-and-butter product, first-class mail, and a regulatory structure that denies management the flexibility to adjust its operations to the new reality.
And interest groups ranging from postal unions to greeting-card makers exert self-interested pressure on the USPS’s ultimate overseer—Congress—insisting that whatever else happens to the Postal Service, aspects of the status quo they depend on get protected. This is why repeated attempts at reform legislation have failed in recent years, leaving the Postal Service unable to pay its bills except by deferring vital modernization.
Now comes word that everyone involved—Democrats, Republicans, the Postal Service, the unions and the system’s heaviest users—has finally agreed on a plan to fix the system. Legislation is moving through the House that would save USPS an estimated $28.6 billion over five years, which could help pay for new vehicles, among other survival measures. Most of the money would come from a penny-per-letter permanent rate increase and from shifting postal retirees into Medicare. The latter step would largely offset the financial burden of annually pre-funding retiree health care, thus addressing a long-standing complaint by the USPS and its unions.
If it clears the House, this measure would still have to get through the Senate—where someone is bound to point out that it amounts to the bare, bare minimum necessary to keep the Postal Service afloat, not comprehensive reform. There’s no change to collective bargaining at the USPS, a major omission considering that personnel accounts for 80 percent of the agency’s costs. Also missing is any discussion of eliminating Saturday letter delivery. That common-sense change enjoys wide public support and would save the USPS $2 billion per year. But postal special-interest groups seem to have killed it, at least in the House. The emerging consensus around the bill is a sign that legislators are getting frightened about a politically embarrassing short-term collapse at the USPS. It is not, however, a sign that they’re getting serious about transforming the postal system for the 21st century.
38、38. The long-standing complaint by the USPS and its unions can be addressed by ________.
A、removing its burden of retiree health care
B、making more investment in new vehicles
C、adopting a new rate-increase mechanism
D、attracting more first-class mail users
The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) continues to bleed red ink. It reported a net loss of $5.6 billion for fiscal 2016, the 10th straight year its expenses have exceeded revenue. Meanwhile, it has more than $120 billion in unfunded liabilities, mostly for employee health and retirement costs. There are many bankruptcies. Fundamentally, the USPS is in a historic squeeze between technological change that has permanently decreased demand for its bread-and-butter product, first-class mail, and a regulatory structure that denies management the flexibility to adjust its operations to the new reality.
And interest groups ranging from postal unions to greeting-card makers exert self-interested pressure on the USPS’s ultimate overseer—Congress—insisting that whatever else happens to the Postal Service, aspects of the status quo they depend on get protected. This is why repeated attempts at reform legislation have failed in recent years, leaving the Postal Service unable to pay its bills except by deferring vital modernization.
Now comes word that everyone involved—Democrats, Republicans, the Postal Service, the unions and the system’s heaviest users—has finally agreed on a plan to fix the system. Legislation is moving through the House that would save USPS an estimated $28.6 billion over five years, which could help pay for new vehicles, among other survival measures. Most of the money would come from a penny-per-letter permanent rate increase and from shifting postal retirees into Medicare. The latter step would largely offset the financial burden of annually pre-funding retiree health care, thus addressing a long-standing complaint by the USPS and its unions.
If it clears the House, this measure would still have to get through the Senate—where someone is bound to point out that it amounts to the bare, bare minimum necessary to keep the Postal Service afloat, not comprehensive reform. There’s no change to collective bargaining at the USPS, a major omission considering that personnel accounts for 80 percent of the agency’s costs. Also missing is any discussion of eliminating Saturday letter delivery. That common-sense change enjoys wide public support and would save the USPS $2 billion per year. But postal special-interest groups seem to have killed it, at least in the House. The emerging consensus around the bill is a sign that legislators are getting frightened about a politically embarrassing short-term collapse at the USPS. It is not, however, a sign that they’re getting serious about transforming the postal system for the 21st century.
39、39. In the last paragraph, the author seems to view legislators with ________.
A、respect
B、tolerance
C、discontent
D、gratitude
The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) continues to bleed red ink. It reported a net loss of $5.6 billion for fiscal 2016, the 10th straight year its expenses have exceeded revenue. Meanwhile, it has more than $120 billion in unfunded liabilities, mostly for employee health and retirement costs. There are many bankruptcies. Fundamentally, the USPS is in a historic squeeze between technological change that has permanently decreased demand for its bread-and-butter product, first-class mail, and a regulatory structure that denies management the flexibility to adjust its operations to the new reality.
And interest groups ranging from postal unions to greeting-card makers exert self-interested pressure on the USPS’s ultimate overseer—Congress—insisting that whatever else happens to the Postal Service, aspects of the status quo they depend on get protected. This is why repeated attempts at reform legislation have failed in recent years, leaving the Postal Service unable to pay its bills except by deferring vital modernization.
Now comes word that everyone involved—Democrats, Republicans, the Postal Service, the unions and the system’s heaviest users—has finally agreed on a plan to fix the system. Legislation is moving through the House that would save USPS an estimated $28.6 billion over five years, which could help pay for new vehicles, among other survival measures. Most of the money would come from a penny-per-letter permanent rate increase and from shifting postal retirees into Medicare. The latter step would largely offset the financial burden of annually pre-funding retiree health care, thus addressing a long-standing complaint by the USPS and its unions.
If it clears the House, this measure would still have to get through the Senate—where someone is bound to point out that it amounts to the bare, bare minimum necessary to keep the Postal Service afloat, not comprehensive reform. There’s no change to collective bargaining at the USPS, a major omission considering that personnel accounts for 80 percent of the agency’s costs. Also missing is any discussion of eliminating Saturday letter delivery. That common-sense change enjoys wide public support and would save the USPS $2 billion per year. But postal special-interest groups seem to have killed it, at least in the House. The emerging consensus around the bill is a sign that legislators are getting frightened about a politically embarrassing short-term collapse at the USPS. It is not, however, a sign that they’re getting serious about transforming the postal system for the 21st century.
40、40. Which of the following would be the best title for the text?
A、The USPS Starts to Miss Its Good Old Days
B、The Postal Service: Keep Away from My Cheese
C、The USPS: Chronic Illness Requires a Quick Cure
D、The Postal Service Needs More than a Band-Aid
41、41. ________→C →42. ________ →43. ________→F→44. ________→45. ________
【A】In December of 1869, Congress appointed a commission to select a site and prepare plans and cost estimates for a new State Department Building. The commission was also to consider possible arrangements for the War and Navy Departments. To the horror of some who expected a Greek Revival twin of the Treasury Building to be erected on the other side of the White House, the elaborate French Second Empire style design by Alfred Mullett was selected, and construction of a building to house all three departments began in June of 1871.
【B】Completed in 1875, the State Department’s south wing was the first to be occupied, with its elegant four-story library (completed in 1876), Diplomatic Reception Room, and Secretary’s office decorated with carved wood, Oriental rugs, and stenciled wall patterns. The Navy Department moved into the east wing in 1879, where elaborate wall and ceiling stenciling and marquetry floors decorated the office of the Secretary.
【C】The State, War, and Navy Building, as it was originally known, housed the three Executive Branch Departments most intimately associated with formulating and conducting the nation’s foreign policy in the last quarter of the nineteenth century and the first quarter of the twentieth century—the period when the United States emerged as an international power. The building has housed some of the nation’s most significant diplomats and politicians and has been the scene of many historic events.
【D】Many of the most celebrated national figures have participated in historical events that have taken place within the EEOB’s granite walls. Theodore and Franklin D. Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Lyndon B. Johnson, Gerald Ford, and George H. W. Bush all had offices in this building before becoming President. It has housed 16 Secretaries of the Navy, 21 Secretaries of War, and 24 Secretaries of State. Winston Churchill once walked its corridors and Japanese emissaries met here with Secretary of State Cordell Hull after the bombing of Pearl Harbor.
【E】The Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB) commands a unique position in both the national history and the architectural heritage of the United States. Designed by Supervising Architect of the Treasury, Alfred B. Mullett, it was built from 1871 to 1888 to house the growing staffs of the State, War, and Navy Departments, and is considered one of the best examples of French Second Empire architecture in the country.
【F】Construction took 17 years as the building slowly rose wing by wing. When the EEOB was finished, it was the largest office building in Washington, with nearly 2 miles of black and white tiled corridors. Almost all of the interior detail is of cast iron or plaster; the use of wood was minimized to insure fire safety. Eight monumental curving staircases of granite with over 4,000 individually cast bronze balusters are capped by four skylight domes and two stained glass rotundas.
【G】The history of the EEOB began long before its foundations were laid. The first executive offices were constructed between 1799 and 1820. A series of fires (including those set by the British in 1814) and overcrowded conditions led to the construction of the existing Treasury Building. In 1866, the construction of the North Wing of the Treasury Building necessitated the demolition of the State Department building.
参考答案：EGABD
42、 Shakespeare’s life time was coincident with a period of extraordinary activity and achievement in the drama. (46) 【By the date of his birth Europe was witnessing the passing of the religious drama, and the creation of new forms under the incentive of classical tragedy and comedy.】 These new forms were at first mainly written by scholars and performed by amateurs, but in England, as everywhere else in western Europe, the growth of a class of professional actors was threatening to make the drama popular, whether it should be new or old, classical or medieval, literary or farcical. Court, school, organizations of amateurs, and the traveling actors were all rivals in supplying a widespread desire for dramatic entertainment; and (47) 【no boy who went to a grammar school could be ignorant that the drama was a form of literature which gave glory to Greece and Rome and might yet bring honor to England.】
When Shakespeare was twelve years old, the first public playhouse was built in London. For a time literature showed no interest in this public stage. Plays aiming at literary distinction were written for schools or court, or for the choir boys of St. Paul’s and the royal chapel, who, however, gave plays in public as well as at court. (48) 【But the professional companies prospered in their permanent theaters, and university men with literature ambitions were quick to turn to these theaters as offering a means of livelihood.】 By the time Shakespeare was twenty-five, Lyly, Peele, and Greene had made comedies that were at once popular and literary; Kyd had written a tragedy that crowded the pit; and Marlowe had brought poetry and genius to triumph on the common stage—where they had played no part since the death of Euripides. (49) 【A native literary drama had been created, its alliance with the public playhouses established, and at least some of its great traditions had been begun.】
The development of the Elizabethan drama for the next twenty-five years is of exceptional interest to students of literary history, for in this brief period we may trace the beginning, growth, blossoming, and decay of many kinds of plays, and of many great careers. We are amazed today at the mere number of plays produced, as well as by the number of dramatists writing at the same time for this London of two hundred thousand inhabitants. (50) 【To realize how great was the dramatic activity, we must remember further that hosts of plays have been lost, and that probably there is no author of note whose entire work has survived.】
参考答案：
46. 在他出生时，欧洲正经历着宗教戏剧的衰退，而在古典悲剧和喜剧的推动下，新式戏剧产生了。
47. 每个上过文法学校的少年都知道戏剧是文学的一种，它曾给希腊和罗马带来荣耀，也许还会将荣耀带给英国。
48. 但是专业剧团因其固定的剧院而得以繁荣，有着文学抱负的大学生迅速投向这些剧院以求谋生。
49. 一种本土的文学戏剧诞生了，它与公共剧院结成联盟，至少，这种戏剧的一些伟大传统已经开始形成。
50. 为了意识到戏剧的伟大之处，我们必须进一步记住，大量的戏剧已经丢失，而且可能没有哪个著名作家的全部作品得到了保留。
三、Section Ⅲ Writing
43、Part A
51. Directions:
Write an email to all international experts on campus, inviting them to attend the graduation ceremony. In your email, you should include time, place and other relevant information about the ceremony.
You should write about 100 words neatly on the ANSEWER SHEET.
Do not use your own name at the end of the email. Use “Li Ming” instead. (10 points)
参考答案：
【参考范文】
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am honored to write this email to invite you to attend the forthcoming graduation ceremony. The ceremony will be hosted in the College Hall on our campus, at 9 o’clock in the morning on next Monday, June 23. The theme of the ceremony is “Let Us Move On”. The ceremony is scheduled to last about 2 hours. At the ceremony, our principal and the representative of the graduates will give a speech, followed by the degree presentation.
Your presence is cordially requested and appreciated, and I am looking forward to your replies at your earliest convenience.
Yours,
Li Ming
【参考译文】
尊敬的先生/女士：
我很荣幸写这封邮件邀请您参加我们即将到来的毕业典礼。典礼将于学校的学院大厅举办，时间为下周一6月23号的上午9点。典礼的主题是“再次启程”。典礼预计持续两个小时左右，典礼首先由校长致辞，接着学生代表发言，最后是颁发学位证书。
我们诚心期待您的到来，恳请您能尽早回复。
此致，
李明
44、
Part B
52. Directions：
Write an essay of 160 to 200 words based on the picture below. In your essay, you should
1) describe the pictures briefly,
2) interpret the meaning, and
3) give your comments.
Write your answer neatly on the ANSWER SHEET. (20 points)
参考答案：
【参考范文】
As is vividly depicted in the picture, a college student has trouble choosing between the two different types of courses: one is the course which emphasizes new knowledge and innovation and thus is difficult to learn, while the other is easy to pass with higher marks and has less assignments.
The picture illustrates the common dilemma most college students have to face. Though many students prefer to choose easy courses to get a high GPA or scholarship, personally I hold that we should take those challenging courses on behalf of our future. First of all, in the society which increasingly focuses on the personnel, the mastery of advanced knowledge will definitely strengthen our competitiveness. Furthermore, the way to success is full of obstacles and hardships. Anyone who is eager to get successful must realize that there is no shortcut to success at all because all achievements come from laborious trial and effort. Taking hard courses can help cultivate our spirits of challenging and working hard.
All in all, students should choose the courses which would benefit them in the long run. Only in this way can we live a meaningful and constructive college life.
【参考译文】
正如图片中生动描绘的一样，一名大学生正烦恼如何在两类课程之间做出选择：一种课程注重新知识、重创新，因此学起来有难度，而另一种课程很容易高分通过，作业也很少。
这幅图片阐释了大多数大学生普遍会遇到的困境。虽然很多学生更愿意为了获得高分数或奖学金去选择容易的课程，但我个人认为，我们应该为了我们的将来而选择那些有挑战性的课程。首先，在越来越重视人才的社会，掌握先进知识必将提高我们的竞争力。而且，通往成功的道路是充满阻碍和艰辛的。任何渴望成功的人必须意识到成功没有捷径，因为所有的成就都是来自于艰苦的尝试和努力。上难度高的课程能培养我们挑战和艰苦奋斗的精神。
总的来说，学生应该选择那些从长远来看带给他们好处的课程。只有这样，我们才能度过一段有意义的、积极的大学生活。
喵呜刷题：让学习像火箭一样快速，快来微信扫码，体验免费刷题服务，开启你的学习加速器！
