刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

 Research shows that in developed countries, more affluent and educated people tend to consume higher-quality diets—including more fruits and vegetables, fish and whole grains. On the contrary, economically disadvantaged people report diets that are nutrient-poor and energy-dense. They are less likely to have food-purchasing habits that conform to public health recommendations.

        These dietary differences are often accompanied by higher rates of obesity and diabetes among lower-income people. This relationship between social class and diet quality and health is extensively documented. However, the research does not explain why this is the case—a question that has significant implications for designing effective policies and initiatives to improve diets and prevent chronic diseases.

        Public-health initiatives to promote healthy diets often focus on providing nutrition education and recipes (食谱). These approaches, however, often presume less food literacy (i.e. food knowledge and skills) among low-income people. Are unhealthy diets really the result of poor choices, limited food skills and knowledge?

        Research suggests that adults in food-insecure households are just as likely as those in food-secure households to adjust recipes to make them more healthy. They are also just as proficient in food preparation and cooking skills. There is no indication that increasing food skills or budgeting skills will reduce food insecurity.

        Instead, disadvantaged groups are constrained by their economic, material and social circumstances. For example, low income is the strongest predictor of food insecurity in Canada, where one in eight households experiences insufficient access to nutritious foods.

        It’s well-established that food prices are an important determinant of food choice. Low-income households report that they find it difficult to adopt dietary guidelines because food prices are a barrier to improving their diets.

        When researchers estimate the cost of diets people actually eat, higher-quality diets are typically more costly.

        While this may be so, it does not, in itself, prove that healthy diets are necessarily more expensive or cost-prohibitive. After all, not all socioeconomically disadvantaged people consume poor diets.

        We can easily think of a number of foods and recipes that are both inexpensive and nutritious. The internet is full of recipes for “eating well on a budget.”

53. What does research reveal about adults in food-insecure households?

A
Their eating habits need to be changed.
B
Their food literacy has been improving.
C
They do not pay much attention to their food recipes.
D
They do not lack food knowledge or budgeting skills.
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

D

解析:

解析:D。根据题干中的adults in food-insecure households可定位至原文第四段。该段提到,家里三餐不继的成年人与那些不愁吃喝的成年人有着同等的饮食知识,但是并没有迹象表明更多的饮食知识或更好的预算能力可以缓解家里吃饭没有保障的情况。由此可知,家中三餐没有保障的成年人并不缺乏食品知识或预算能力,故正确答案为D。

错项排除:原文中没有提到家中三餐不继的人需要改变饮食习惯,或是他们的饮食素养正在提高,故排除A项和B项。原文中提到,家里三餐不继的成年人同样会通过调整菜单来吃得更健康,C项与此相悖,故错误。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:53. What does research reveal about adults in food

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share