刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

 Research shows that in developed countries, more affluent and educated people tend to consume higher-quality diets—including more fruits and vegetables, fish and whole grains. On the contrary, economically disadvantaged people report diets that are nutrient-poor and energy-dense. They are less likely to have food-purchasing habits that conform to public health recommendations.

        These dietary differences are often accompanied by higher rates of obesity and diabetes among lower-income people. This relationship between social class and diet quality and health is extensively documented. However, the research does not explain why this is the case—a question that has significant implications for designing effective policies and initiatives to improve diets and prevent chronic diseases.

        Public-health initiatives to promote healthy diets often focus on providing nutrition education and recipes (食谱). These approaches, however, often presume less food literacy (i.e. food knowledge and skills) among low-income people. Are unhealthy diets really the result of poor choices, limited food skills and knowledge?

        Research suggests that adults in food-insecure households are just as likely as those in food-secure households to adjust recipes to make them more healthy. They are also just as proficient in food preparation and cooking skills. There is no indication that increasing food skills or budgeting skills will reduce food insecurity.

        Instead, disadvantaged groups are constrained by their economic, material and social circumstances. For example, low income is the strongest predictor of food insecurity in Canada, where one in eight households experiences insufficient access to nutritious foods.

        It’s well-established that food prices are an important determinant of food choice. Low-income households report that they find it difficult to adopt dietary guidelines because food prices are a barrier to improving their diets.

        When researchers estimate the cost of diets people actually eat, higher-quality diets are typically more costly.

        While this may be so, it does not, in itself, prove that healthy diets are necessarily more expensive or cost-prohibitive. After all, not all socioeconomically disadvantaged people consume poor diets.

        We can easily think of a number of foods and recipes that are both inexpensive and nutritious. The internet is full of recipes for “eating well on a budget.”

54. What would help improve food security among the disadvantaged groups in Canada?

A
Teaching them budgeting skills.
B
Increasing their food choices.
C
Enabling them to have more access to nutritious foods.
D
Taking more effective measures to increase food supplies.
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

C

解析:

解析:C。根据题干中的disadvantaged groups和in Canada可定位至原文第五段。该段提到,在加拿大,低收入就意味着可能食物没有保障,它导致一些家庭无法获得足够的营养食物。由此可知,要想改善弱势群体的饮食保障,应该让他们更多地获得营养食物,故正确答案为C。

错项排除:原文中提到,弱势群体并不缺乏预算能力,故A项排除。原文没有提到食物选择少或是粮食供应影响了加拿大弱势群体的饮食保障,故排除B项和D项。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:54. What would help improve food security among th

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share