刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

      As many office workers adapt to remote work, cities may undergo fundamental change if offices remain under-utilized. Who will benefit if working from home becomes the norm?

        Employers argue they make considerable savings on real estate when workers shift from office to home work. However, these savings result from passing costs on to workers.

       Unless employees are fully compensated, this could become a variant of parasitic (寄生的) capitalism, whereby corporate profits increasingly rely on extracting value from the public—and now personal—realm, rather than on generating new value.

        Though employers are backed by a chorus of remote work advocates, others note the loneliness, reduced productivity and inefficiencies of extended remote work.

        If working from home becomes permanent, employees will have to dedicate part of their private space to work. This requires purchasing desks, chairs and office equipment.

       It also means having private space dedicated to work: the space must be heated, cleaned, maintained and paid for. That depends on many things, but for purposes of illustration, I have run some estimates for Montréal. The exercise is simple but important, since it brings these costs out of the realm of speculation into the realm of meaningful discussion.

        Rough calculations show that the savings made by employers when their staff works from home are of similar value to the compensation workers should receive for setting up offices at home.

       What does this mean for offices in cities? One of two things may happen: Employers pass these costs onto employees. This would be a form of expropriation (侵占), with employees absorbing production costs that have traditionally been paid by the employer. This represents a considerable transfer of value from employees to employers.

        When employees are properly compensated, employer’s real estate savings will be modest. If savings are modest, then the many advantages of working in offices—such as lively atmosphere, rapidity of communication, team-building and acclimatization (适应环境) of new employees—will encourage employers to shelve the idea of remote work and, like Yahoo in 2013, encourage employees to work most of the time from corporate office space.

47. Why do some people oppose working from home?

A
It discourages team spirit.
B
It invades employees’ privacy.
C
It undermines traditional values.
D
It negatively impacts productivity.
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

D

解析:

解析:D。根据题干中的oppose working from home可定位至文章第四段。由第四段的Though(虽然)的转折关系和are backed(支持)可知,第四段后半部分是讲反对在家工作的人的观点,该句提到,远程工作的扩展带来了孤独感、生产率降低和效率低下。D项与此内容相符,其中working from home对应该句的remote work,impacts productivity对应该句的reduced productivity,故D项为正确答案。

错项排除:A、B、C三项利用文中的个别词team、private、value进行干扰,但文中说的是团队建设(team-building),私人空间(private space)和创造的价值(value),并非team spirit、employee’s privacy和traditional values,故A、B、C三项错误。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:47. Why do some people oppose working from home?

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share