刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

        Can you remember what you ate yesterday? If asked, most people will be able to give a vague description of their main meals: breakfast, lunch, dinner. But can you be sure you’ve noted every snack bar in your car, or every handful of nuts at your desk? Most people will have a feeling that they’ve missed something out.

        We originally had this suspicion back in 2016, puzzled by the fact that national statistics showed calorie consumption falling dramatically over past decades. We found reliable evidence that people were drastically under-reporting what they ate.

        Now the Office for National Statistics has confirmed that we are consuming 50% more calories than our national statistics claim.

        Why is this happening? We can point to at least three potential causes. One is the rise in obesity levels itself. Under-reporting rates are much higher for obese people, because they simply consume more food, and thus have more to remember.

        Another cause is that the proportion of people who are trying to lose weight has been increasing over time. People who want to lose weight are more likely to under-report their eating—regardless of whether they are overweight or not. This may be driven partly by self-deception or “wishful thinking”.

       The final potential cause is an increase in snacking and eating out over recent decades—both in terms of how often they happen and how much they contribute to our overall energy intake. Again, there is evidence that food consumed out of the home is one of the most poorly recorded categories in surveys.

        So, what’s the message conveyed? For statistics, we should invest in more accurate measurement options. For policy, we need to focus on options that make it easy for people to eat fewer calories. If people do not know how much they are eating, it can be really hard for them to stick to a diet. Also, we should be looking for new ways to ensure what people eat wouldn’t have much impact on their waistlines. If this works, it won’t matter if they can’t remember what they ate yesterday.

51. What did the author suspect back in 2016?

A
Calorie consumption had fallen drastically over the decades.
B
Most people surveyed were reluctant to reveal what they ate.
C
The national statistics did not reflect the actual calorie consumption.
D
Most people did not include snacks when reporting their calorie intake.
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

C

解析:

解析:C。根据题干中的suspect和back in 2016可定位至第二段第一句。该句指出,早在2016年,我们就怀疑过人们漏报了自己的饮食,随后讲到原因,国家统计数据显示过去几十年卡路里摄入量大幅下降,但是有证据表明人们严重漏报了自己的饮食。由此可知,作者怀疑的是国家统计数据不准确,C项与此内容相符,因此正确答案为C。

错项排除:A项描述的是国家统计数据所显示的结果,并不是作者的怀疑,故排除。原文中说到人们会漏报(Under-reporting)摄入的食物,并没有说他们不愿意透露(reluctant to reveal)或是报告中不包括零食(did not include snacks),B、D两项偷换概念,故均可排除。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:51. What did the author suspect back in 2016?

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share