刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

    The fifth largest city in the US passed a significant soda tax proposal that will levy (征税) 1.5 cents per liquid ounce on distributors.

    Philadelphia’s new measure was approved by a 13 to 4 city council vote. It sets a new bar for similar initiatives across the country. It is proof that taxes on sugary drinks can win substantial support outside super-liberal areas. Until now, the only city to successfully pass and implement a soda tax was Berkeley, California, in 2014.

    The tax will apply to regular and diet sodas, as well as other drinks with added sugar, such as Gatorade and iced teas. It’s expected to raise $410 million over the next five years, most of which will go toward funding a universal pre-kindergarten program for the city.

    While the city council vote was met with applause inside the council room, opponents to the measure, including soda lobbyists, made sharp criticisms and a promise to challenge the tax in court.

    “The tax passed today unfairly singles out beverages—including low- and no-calorie choices,” said Lauren Kane, spokeswoman for the American Beverage Association. “But most importantly, it is against the law. So we will side with the majority of the people of Philadelphia who oppose this tax and take legal action to stop it.”

    An industry-backed anti-tax campaign has spent at least $4 million on advertisements. The ads criticized the measure, characterizing it as a “grocery tax”.

    Public health groups applauded the approved tax as a step toward fixing certain lasting health issues that plague Americans. “The move to recapture a small part of the profits from an industry that pushes a product that contributes to diabetes, obesity and heart disease in poorer communities in order to reinvest in those communities will sure be inspirational to many other places,” said Jim Krieger, executive director of Healthy Food America. “Indeed, we are already hearing from some of them. It’s not ‘just Berkeley’ anymore.”

    Similar measures in California’s Albany, Oakland, San Francisco and Colorado’s Boulder are becoming hot-button issues. Health advocacy groups have hinted that even more might be coming.

49. What did public health groups think the soda tax would do?

A
Alert people to the risk of sugar-induced diseases.
B
Help people to fix certain long-time health issues.
C
Add to the fund for their research on diseases.
D
Benefit low-income people across the country.
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

B

解析:

解析:B。根据题干中的public health groups可定位至倒数第二段首句。该句提到,公共卫生组织对通过的这项税收表示赞同,认为它有助于解决困扰美国人的某些长期健康问题。B项中的fix certain long-time health issues对应原文中的fixing certain lasting health issues,故正确答案为B。A 项用disease设置干扰,但原文倒数第二段提到了几种疾病,但并没有说明提醒人们注意由糖引起的疾病的风险,故A项错误。原文倒数第二段第二句说到,为了重新投资于贫困社区,制药行业曾在贫困社区推广一种会治疗糖尿病、肥胖症和心脏病的产品,而从该行业获得的利润中抽取一小部分用于再投资,这一举措肯定会鼓舞许多其他地方。这部分不能体现碳酸饮料税为疾病研究增加资金或惠及全国低收入人群,故C和D两项排除。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:49. What did public health groups think the soda t

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share