刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

    “Sugar, alcohol and tobacco,” economist Adam Smith once wrote, “are commodities which are nowhere necessaries of life, which have become objects of almost universal consumption, and which are, therefore, extremely popular subjects of taxation.”

    Two and a half centuries on, most countries impose some sort of tax on alcohol and tobacco. With surging obesity levels putting increasing strain on public health systems, governments around the world have begun to toy with the idea of taxing sugar as well.

    Whether such taxes work is a matter of debate. A preliminary review of Mexico’s taxation found a fall in purchases of taxed drinks as well as a rise in sales of untaxed and healthier drinks. By contrast, a Danish tax on foods high in fats was abandoned a year after its introduction, amid claims that consumers were avoiding it by crossing the border to Germany to satisfy their desire for cheaper, fattier fare.

    The food industry has, in general, been firmly opposed to such direct government action. Nonetheless, the renewed focus on waistlines means that industry groups are under pressure to demonstrate their products are healthy as well as tasty.

    Over the past three decades, the industry has made some efforts to improve the quality of its offerings. For example, some drink manufactures have cut the amount of sugar in their beverages.

    Many of the reductions over the past 30 years have been achieved either by reducing the amount of sugar, salt or fat in a product, or by finding an alternative ingredient. More recently, however, some companies have been investing money in a more ambitious undertaking: learning how to adjust the fundamental make-up of the food they sell. For example, having salt on the outside, but none on the inside, reduces the salt content without changing the taste.

    While reformulating recipes ( 配 方 ) is one way to improve public health, it  should be part of a multi-sided approach. The key is to remember that there is not just one solution. To deal with obesity, a mixture of approaches—including reformulation, taxation and adjusting portion sizes—will be needed. There is no silver bullet.

What do we learn about Danish taxation on fat-rich foods?

A
It did not work out as well as was expected.
B
It gave rise to a lot of problems on the border.
C
It could not succeed without German cooperation.
D
It met with firm opposition from the food industry.​​​​​​​
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

A

解析:

48. A)It did not work out as well as was expected.

解析:细节推断题。根据题干中的Danish taxation on fat-rich foods定位至文章第三段第三句。第三句表明,丹麦对高脂肪食物的征税一年之后就取消,这是因为消费者为了避税跑到德国买低价的高脂肪食物。此举并未实现提高税费,阻止人们去购买高脂肪食物的目标,因此A项是对原文信息的概括。B项以及C项中分别出现了border以及German,但这是很明显的曲解原意选项,再次证明看到原词重现反而要多加注意。D项“遭到食品行业抵制”在原文中未出现。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:What do we learn about Danish taxation on fat-rich

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share