刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

        The trend toward rationality and enlightenment was endangered long before the advent of the World Wide Web. As Neil Postman noted in his 1985 book Amusing Ourselves to Death, the rise of television introduced not just a new medium but a new discourse: a gradual shift from a typographic (印刷的) culture to a photographic one, which in turn meant a shift from rationality to emotions, exposition to entertainment. In an image-centered and pleasure-driven world, Postman noted, there is no place for rational thinking, because you simply cannot think with images. It is text that enables us to “uncover lies, confusions and overgeneralizations, and to detect abuses of logic and common sense. It also means to weigh ideas, to compare and contrast assertions, to connect one generalization to another.”

        The dominance of television was not confined to our living rooms. It overturned all of those habits of mind, fundamentally changing our experience of the world, affecting the conduct of politics, religion, business, and culture. It reduced many aspects of modern life to entertainment, sensationalism, and commerce. “Americans don’t talk to each other, we entertain each other,” Postman wrote. “They don’t exchange ideas, they exchange images. They do not argue with propositions, they argue with good looks, celebrities and commercials.”

          At first, the web seemed to push against this trend. When it emerged towards the end of the 1980s as a purely text-based medium, it was seen as a tool to pursue knowledge, not pleasure. Reason and thought were most valued in this garden—all derived from the project of the Enlightenment. Universities around the world were among the first to connect to this new medium, which hosted discussion groups, informative personal or group blogs, electronic magazines, and academic mailing lists and forums. It was an intellectual project, not about commerce or control, created in a scientific research center in Switzerland. And for more than a decade, the web created an alternative space that threatened television’s grip on society.

         Social networks, though, have since colonized the web for television’s values. From Facebook to Instagram, the medium refocuses our attention on videos and images, rewarding emotional appeals—‘like’ buttons—over rational ones. Instead of a quest for knowledge, it engages us in an endless zest (热情) for instant approval from an audience, for which we are constantly but unconsciously performing. (It’s telling that, while Google began life as a PhD thesis, Facebook started as a tool to judge classmates’ appearances.) It reduces our curiosity by showing us exactly what we already want and think, based on our profiles and preferences. The Enlightenment’s motto (座右铭) of ‘Dare to know’ has become ‘Dare not to care to know’.

48. How has television impacted Americans?

A
It has given them a lot more to argue about.
B
It has brought celebrities closer to their lives.
C
It has made them care more about what they say.
D
It has rendered their interactions more superficial.
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

D

解析:

解析:D。根据题干中的television和Americans可定位至原文第二段。从第一句可以看出本段主要是讲电视的影响,本段前三句说到电视对人们的整体影响,后面引用波兹曼的话指出电视对美国人的具体影响:美国人相互之间并不交谈,而是互相娱乐,他们不做想法的交流,他们进行影像交流。他们并不是围绕观点讨论,他们围绕美貌、名人和商业广告争论。由此可知,美国人之间的互动是表面的、浅层次的,D项与此内容相符,其中superficial是对最后两句中人们之间互动的概括总结,故正确。

错项排除:文中第二段最后虽然提到了argue,但说的是人们争论的内容,并非争论变多了(a lot more to argue),故A项排除。B项利用第二段最后一句中的celebrities进行干扰,但说的是人们围绕名人展开争论,并非名人更贴近人们的生活,B项语义理解偏差,故排除。C项的care more about在文章中无依据,故排除。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:48. How has television impacted Americans?

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share