刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

        Selective colleges and universities in the U.S. are under fire for being too elite and too expensive, and for not training graduates for the world of work. Such charges ignore the fact that these institutions continue to prepare students for success in their work, for thoughtful engagement in civic life, for lifelong learning, and for understanding the world and those with whom they live.

        These colleges and universities must be doing something right. Applications are at record highs, and their financial aid programs make them more accessible than ever. This model of education has long played a central role in creating opportunity, driving economic growth, and spurring innovation.

        Yet, there is growing skepticism about the value of this model. The recent tax reform bill is a wake-up call that our strongest colleges and universities are under assault by some in government. The initial proposals would have made education unaffordable for many by taxing tuition waivers for graduate students and ending deductions for student loan interest. Thankfully, these provisions were ultimately stripped from the bill, but lawmakers let stand a new tax on the investment income of some colleges and universities.

        While these attacks are motivated by misguided ideas, we need to do a better job of explaining why these claims are false and why what we do is valuable. We cannot take for granted that any of this is obvious.

        It is often said that elite colleges and universities do not train students, particularly those who study the liberal arts, for the workforce. But this can be refuted by scholarly research. The data are clear: a liberal arts education is great career preparation, both for excellent lifetime earnings and for satisfaction with the work. This education develops the skills of critical thinking, rigorous analysis of data and facts, communication with the written and spoken word, understanding of cultural differences and issues, and the ability to keep learning. In fact, liberal arts graduates do extremely well in every imaginable field.

        Access to an education at selective colleges and universities is now more available than ever to low- and middle-income families. We have built endowments from donations by alumni (校友) and parents who understand and appreciate our mission to provide access and opportunity, and a significant portion of the returns from these endowments is used to fund financial aid.

        Ironically, the new tax on endowments drains financial aid funds from the very schools most able to offer opportunity to those who have earned a spot but cannot otherwise afford this education. Beyond the virtue of access to those who have earned a place at these schools, the diversity of economic backgrounds enhances the education and experience of all of our students.

48. What do we learn about the initial proposals concerning the recent tax reform bill?

A
They would have stripped many students of life’s chances.
B
They would have deducted graduate student loan interest.
C
They would have added to many students’ financial burden.
D
They would have increased the number of tuition waivers.
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

C

解析:

解析:C。根据题干中的the initial proposals和recent tax reform bill可定位至原文第三段第三句。该句提到,最初的提案要求对减免研究生学费的院校进行征税,以及不再减免学生贷款利息,而这会使得很多人负担不起学费(made education unaffordable for many)。由此可知,近期税务改革法案的初步建议会增加许多学生的经济负担,故C项为正确答案。

错项排除:A项中的life’s chances在原文中无依据,故排除。B项利用原文中的deductions for student loan interest设置干扰,但原文中说的是不再减免学生贷款利息,B项与此相悖,故排除。D项利用原文中的tuition waivers设置干扰,但原文中未提到增加减免学费的名额,故排除D项。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:48. What do we learn about the initial proposals c

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share