刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

        Social media is absolutely everywhere. Billions of people use social media on a daily basis to create, share, and exchange ideas, messages, and information. Both individuals and businesses post regularly to engage and interact with people from around the world. It is a powerful communication medium that simultaneously provides immediate, frequent, permanent, and wide-reaching information across the globe.

        People post their lives on social media for the world to see. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and countless other social channels provide a quick and simple way to glimpse into a job candidate’s personal life—both the positive and negative sides of it. Social media screening is tempting to use as part of the hiring process, but should employers make use of it when researching a potential candidate’s background?

        Incorporating the use of social media to screen job candidates is not an uncommon practice. A 2018 survey found that almost 70% of employers use social media to screen candidates before hiring them. But there are consequences and potential legal risks involved too. When done inappropriately, social media screening can be considered unethical or even illegal.

        Social media screening is essentially scrutinising a job candidate’s private life. It can reveal information about protected characteristics like age, race, nationality, disability, gender, religion, etc. and that could bias a hiring decision. Pictures or comments on a private page that are taken out of context could ruin a perfectly good candidate’s chances of getting hired. This process could potentially give an unfair advantage to one candidate over another. It creates an unequal playing field and potentially provides hiring managers with information that can impact their hiring decision in a negative way.

        It’s hard to ignore social media as a screening tool. While there are things that you shouldn’t see, there are some things that can be lawfully considered—making it a valuable source of relevant information too. Using social media screening appropriately can help ensure that you don’t hire a toxic employee who will cost you money or stain your company’s reputation. Consider the lawful side of this process and you may be able to hire the best employee ever. There is a delicate balance.

        Screening job candidates on social media must be done professionally and responsibly. Companies should stipulate that they will never ask for passwords, be consistent, document decisions, consider the source used and be aware that other laws may apply. In light of this it is probably best to look later in the process and ask human resources for help in navigating it. Social media is here to stay. But before using social media to screen job candidates, consulting with management and legal teams beforehand is essential in order to comply with all laws.

48. When could online personal information be detrimental to candidates?

A
When it is separated from context.
B
When it is scrutinised by an employer. 
C
When it is magnified to a ruinous degree.
D
When it is revealed to the human resources.
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

A

解析:

解析:A。根据题干中的personal information和detrimental可定位至原文第四段第三句,题干中的personal information对应该句的Pictures or comments on a private page,detrimental对应该句的ruin a perfectly good candidate’s chances。该句指出,私人页面上断章取义的照片或评论可能会毁掉一个非常好的求职者被录用的机会。由此可知,当信息被断章取义拿出来时会对求职者不利,A项与此内容相符,其中separated from context是该句中taken out of context的同义替换,故正确。

错项排除:文中虽然提到了scrutinising,但说的是社交媒体筛选本质上是审查求职者的私人生活,并没有说这对求职者不利,故B项排除。C项的magnified和ruinous degree在文章中无依据,故排除。D项利用第四段第二句的reveal和最后一段第三句的human resources进行拼凑,故排除。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:48. When could online personal information be detr

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share