刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

        We often think of drawing as something that takes inborn talent, but this kind of thinking stems from our misclassification of drawing as, primarily, an art form rather than a tool for learning.

        Researchers, teachers, and artists are starting to see how drawing can positively impact a wide variety of skills and disciplines.

       Most of us have spent some time drawing before, but at some point, most of us stop drawing. There are people who don’t, obviously, and thank god for that: a world without designers and artists would be a very shabby one indeed.

        Some argue that so many adults have abandoned drawing because we’ve miscategorized it and given it a very narrow definition. In his book, Stick Figures: Drawing as a Human Practice, Professor D. B. Dowd argues that we have misfiled the significance of drawing because we see it as a professional skill instead of a personal capacity. We mistakenly think of “good” drawings as those which work as recreations of the real world, as realistic illusions. Rather, drawing should be recategorized as a symbolic tool.

       Human beings have been drawing for 73,000 years. It’s part of what it means to be human. We don’t have the strength of chimpanzees (大猩猩) because we’ve given up animal strength to manipulate subtle instruments, like hammers, spears, and—later—pens and pencils. The human hand is an extremely dense network of nerve endings. In many ways, human beings are built to draw.

        Some researchers argue that doodling (涂画) activates the brain’s so-called default circuit—essentially, the areas of the brain responsible for maintaining a baseline level of activity in the absence of other stimuli. Because of this, some believe that doodling during a boring lecture can help students pay attention. In one study, participants were asked to listen to a list of names while either doodling or sitting still. Those who doodled remembered 29 percent more of the names than those who did not.

       There’s also evidence that drawing talent is based on how accurately someone perceives the world. The human visual system tends to misjudge size, shape, color, and angles but artists perceive these qualities more accurately than non-artists. Cultivating drawing talent can become an essential tool to improve people’s observational skills in fields where the visual is important.

        Rather than think of drawing as a talent that some creative people are gifted in, we should consider it as a tool for seeing and understanding the world better—one that just so happens to double as an art form. Both absent-minded doodling and copying from life have been shown to positively affect your memory and visual perception, so complain loudly the next time your school board slashes the art department’s budget.

47. What do we learn about designers and artists?

A
They are declining gradually in number.
B
They are keen on changing shabby surroundings.
C
They add beauty and charm to the world.
D
They spend most of their lives drawing.
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

C

解析:

解析:C。根据题干中的designers and artists定位至第三段第二句。该句表示,一个没有设计师和艺术家的世界将会是非常糟糕的。由此可知,设计师和艺术家使世界变得美好,故C项正确。

错项排除:原文中提到,到了某个时候,大多数人放弃了画画,有些人没放弃,但设计师和艺术家的人数是否减少在原文中未提及,故A项排除。B项利用原文第三段第二句中出现的shabby一词作干扰,但原文强调的是没有设计师和艺术家的世界会因为缺乏美的创造而单调、乏味、无趣,并不是说设计师和艺术家热衷于改变破旧的环境,B项曲解了原文中shabby的含义,故错误。原文第三段表示,有一些人在画画的路上没有半途而废,最后成为了设计师和艺术家,但并没有说他们一生大部分时间都在画画,D项属于过度推断,故排除。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:47. What do we learn about designers and artists?

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share