刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

        Imagine that an alien species landed on Earth and, through their mere presence, those aliens caused our art to vanish, our music to homogenize, and our technological know-how to disappear. That is effectively what humans have been doing to our closest relatives—chimps (大猩猩).

        Back in 1999, a team of scientists led by Andrew Whiten showed that chimps from different parts of Africa behave very differently from one another. Some groups would get each other’s attention by rapping branches with their knuckles (指关节), while others did it by loudly ripping leaves with their teeth. The team identified 39 of these traditions that are practiced by some communities but not others—a pattern that, at the time, hadn’t been seen in any animal except humans. It was evidence, the team said, that chimps have their own cultures.

        It took a long time to convince skeptics that such cultures exist, but now we have plenty of examples of animals learning local traditions from one another.

        But just when many scientists have come to accept the existence of animal cultures, many of those cultures might vanish. Ammie Kalan and her colleagues have shown, through years of intensive fieldwork, that the very presence of humans has eroded the diversity of chimp behavior. Where we flourish, their cultures wither. It is a bitterly ironic thing to learn on the 20th anniversary of Whiten’s classic study.

        “It’s amazing to think that just 60 years ago, we knew next to nothing of the behavior of our sister species in the wild,” Whiten says. “But now, just as we are truly getting to know our primate (灵长类) cousins, the actions of humans are closing the window on all we have discovered.”

        “Sometimes in the rush to conserve the species, I think we forget about the individuals,” says Cat Hobaiter, a professor at the University of St. Andrews. “Each population, each community, even each generation of chimps is unique. An event might only have a small impact on the total population of chimps, but it may wipe out an entire community—an entire culture. No matter what we do to restore habitat or support population growth, we may never be able to restore that culture.”

        No one knows whether the destruction of chimp culture is getting worse. Few places have tracked chimp behavior over long periods, and those that have are also more likely to have protected their animals from human influence.

        Obviously conservationists need to think about saving species in a completely new way—by preserving animal traditions as well as bodies and genes. “Instead of focusing only on the conservation of genetically based entities like species, we now need to also consider culturally based entities,” says Andrew Whiten.

55. What does the author suggest conservationists do?

A
Focus entirely on culturally-based entities rather than genetically-based ones
B
Place more stress on animal traditions than on their physical conservation.
C
Conserve animal species in a novel and all-round way.
D
Explore the cultures of species before they vanish.
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

C

解析:

解析:C。根据题干中的suggest和conservationists可定位到最后一段第一句。定位句指出,显然环保主义者需要想出一种全新的方式来拯救物种——既要保护动物文化,也要保护生命和基因。C项与此内容相符,其中Conserve animal species对应定位句中的saving species,in a novel and all-round way对应该句中的in a completely new way,故C项正确。

错项排除:A、B两项利用全文最后一句中的genetically based entities和culturally based entities设置干扰,但该句说的是既要重视基于基因的实体保护,也要重视基于文化的实体保护,并不是说只重视文化保护,不重视基因保护,而且该句是安德鲁·怀顿的看法,不是作者的看法,故A、B两项排除。原文第五段提到安德鲁·怀顿的感慨:在人类刚开始了解动物文化时,动物文化已经开始向人类关上了窗口,但这只是因为动物文化受人类影响而衰退,原文没有提到物种消失,而且该句也不是作者的提议,故D项排除。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:55. What does the author suggest conservationists

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share