刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

    Among the annoying challenges facing the middle class is one that will probably go unmentioned in the next presidential campaign: What happens when the robots come for their jobs?

    Don’t dismiss that possibility entirely. About half of U.S. jobs are at high risk of being automated, according to a University of Oxford study, with the middle class disproportionately squeezed. Lower-income jobs like gardening or day care don’t appeal to robots. But many middle-class occupations—trucking, financial advice, software engineering—have aroused their interest, or soon will. The rich own the robots, so they will be fine.

    This isn’t to be alarmist. Optimists point out that technological upheaval has benefited workers in the past. The Industrial Revolution didn’t go so well for Luddites whose jobs were displaced by mechanized looms, but it eventually raised living standards and created more jobs than it destroyed. Likewise, automation should eventually boost productivity, stimulate demand by driving down prices, and free workers from hard, boring work. But in the medium term, middle-class workers may need a lot of help adjusting.

    The first step, as Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee argue in The Second Machine Age, should be rethinking education and job training. Curriculums—from grammar school to college—should evolve to focus less on memorizing facts and more on creativity and complex communication. Vocational schools should do a better job of fostering problem-solving skills and helping students work alongside robots. Online education can supplement the traditional kind. It could make extra training and instruction affordable. Professionals trying to acquire new skills will be able to do so without going into debt.

    The challenge of coping with automation underlines the need for the U.S. to revive its fading business dynamism: Starting new companies must be made easier. In previous eras of drastic technological change, entrepreneurs smoothed the transition by dreaming up ways to combine labor and machines. The best uses of 3D printers and virtual reality haven’t been invented yet. The U.S. needs the new companies that will invent them.

    Finally, because automation threatens to widen the gap between capital income and labor income, taxes and the safety net will have to be rethought. Taxes on low-wage labor need to be cut, and wage subsidies such as the earned income tax credit should be expanded: This would boost incomes, encourage work, reward companies for job creation, and reduce inequality.

Technology will improve society in ways big and small over the next few years, yet this will be little comfort to those who find their lives and careers upended by automation. Destroying the machines that are coming for our jobs would be nuts. But policies to help workers adapt will be indispensable.

22. Which of the following best represent the author’s view?

A
Worries about automation are in fact groundless.
B
Optimists’ opinions on new tech find little support.
C
Issues arising from automation need to be tackled.
D
Negative consequences of new tech can be avoided.
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

C

解析:

答案精析:本题需要结合全文进行解答。第三段中,作者提到机器人取代中产阶级工作的可能性并不是危言耸听(This isn’t to be alarmist)、工业革命对反对技术进步者并不那么友好、中产阶级工人可能需要大量帮助进行调整。作者在最后一段最后一句也说到,帮助工人适应这种变革的政策却不可或缺。由此可见,自动化的到来会带来一些问题,而中产阶级则需要帮助来适应这些问题,选C。

错项排除:上文已经提到自动化会带来种种问题,A与这些事实相反,错误。第三段中提到,乐观者指出,在过去,技术剧变使工人受益,一个例子就是技术革命最终提高了生活标准,创造出的工作数量比淘汰的要多。可见,乐观者提出的观点是有证据支撑的,B错。全文并没有提到新科技的负面影响是否可以被规避,D错。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:22. Which of the following best represent the auth

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share