刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

    First two hours, now three hours—this is how far in advance authorities are recommending people show up to catch a domestic flight, at least at some major U.S. airports with increasingly massive security lines.

    Americans are willing to tolerate time-consuming security procedures in return for increased safety. The crash of EgyptAir Flight 804,which terrorists may have downed over the Mediterranean Sea, provides another tragic reminder of why. But demanding too much of air travelers or providing too little security in return undermines public support for the process. And it should: Wasted time is a drag on Americans’ economic and private lives, not to mention infuriating.

    Last year, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) found in a secret check that undercover investigators were able to sneak weapons—both fake and real—past airport security nearly every time they tried. Enhanced security measures since then, combined with a rise in airline travel due to the improving economy and low oil prices, have resulted in long waits at major airports such as Chicago’s O’Hare International. It is not yet clear how much more effective airline security has become—but the lines are obvious.

    Part of the issue is that the government did not anticipate the steep increase in airline travel, so the TSA is now rushing to get new screeners on the line. Part of the issue is that airports have only so much room for screening lanes. Another factor may be that more people are trying to overpack their carry-on bags to avoid checked-baggage fees, though the airlines strongly dispute this.

    There is one step the TSA could take that would not require remodeling airports or rushing to hire: Enroll more people in the PreCheck program. PreCheck is supposed to be a win-win for travelers and the TSA. Passengers who pass a background check are eligible to use expedited screening lanes. This allows the TSA to focus on travelers who are higher risk, saving time for everyone involved. The TSA wants to enroll 25 million people in PreCheck.

    It has not gotten anywhere close to that, and one big reason is sticker shock: Passengers must pay $85 every five years to process their background checks. Since the beginning, this price tag has been PreCheck’s fatal flaw. Upcoming reforms might bring the price to a more reasonable level. But Congress should look into doing so directly, by helping to finance PreCheck enrollment or to cut costs in other ways.

    The TSA cannot continue diverting resources into underused PreCheck lanes while most of the traveling public suffers in unnecessary lines. It is long past time to make the program work.

24. One problem with the PreCheck program is ________.

A
a dramatic reduction of its scale
B
its wrongly-directed implementation
C
the government’s reluctance to back it
D
an unreasonable price for enrollment
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

D

解析:

答案精析:第五段中说到了预检可以节省时间,但作者在第六段中话锋一转,指出加入预检的人数离2500万人的目标还差得很多,而其致命缺陷(fatal flaw)是价格贵得惊人(sticker shock)。由此可知,答案为D。

错项排除:第六段第一句说到加入预检的人数还远远达不到目标,但并没有说因此会大幅度缩减规模,A错。第五段中提到的预检实行的方向是明确的,即针对不同背景人群实施不同检查,这样能够节省安检时间,B错。第六段末尾提到国会可以资助预检项目,但并没有说政府是否愿意这样做,C错。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:24. One problem with the PreCheck program is _____

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share