刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

    With so much focus on children’s use of screens, it’s easy for parents to forget about their own screen use. “Tech is designed to really suck on you in,” says Jenny Radesky in her study of digital play, “and digital products are there to promote maximal engagement. It makes it hard to disengage, and leads to a lot of bleed-over into the family routine.”

    Radesky has studied the use of mobile phones and tablets at mealtimes by giving mother-child pairs a food-testing exercise. She found that mothers who used devices during the exercise started 20 percent fewer verbal and 39 percent fewer nonverbal interactions with their children. During a separate observation, she saw that phones became a source of tension in the family. Parents would be looking at their emails while the children would be making excited bids for their attention.

    Infants are wired to look at parents’ faces to try to understand their world, and if those faces are blank and unresponsive—as they often are when absorbed in a device—it can be extremely disconcerting for the children. Radesky cites the “still face experiment” devised by developmental psychologist Ed Tronick in the 1970s. In it, a mother is asked to interact with her child in a normal way before putting on a blank expression and not giving them any visual social feedback: the child becomes increasingly distressed as she tries to capture her mother’s attention. “Parents don’t have to be exquisitely parents at all times, but there needs to be a balance and parents need to be responsive and sensitive to a child’s verbal or nonverbal expressions of an emotional need,” says Radesky.

    On the other hand, Tronick himself is concerned that the worries about kids’ use of screens are born out of an “oppressive ideology that demands that parents should always be interacting” with their children: “It’s based on a somewhat fantasized, very white, very upper-middle-class ideology that says if you’re failing to expose your child to 30,000 words you are neglecting them.” Tronick believes that just because a child isn’t learning from the screen doesn’t mean there’s no value to it—particularly if it gives parents time to have a shower, do housework or simply have a break from their child. Parents, he says, can get a lot out of using their devices to speak to a friend or get some work out of the way. This can make them feel happier, which lets them be more available to their child the rest of the time.

28. Radesky cites the “still face experiment” to show that ________.

A
it is easy for children to get used to blank expressions
B
verbal expressions are unnecessary for emotional exchange
C
children are insensitive to changes in their parents’ mood
D
parents need to respond to children’s emotional needs
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

D

解析:

答案精析:根据题干中的still face experiment可定位至第三段中的第二至四句。第三句指出母亲由正常交流变得面无表情时,孩子会感到迷惑和不安。之后又提及父母应对孩子的情感需求作出反应和保持敏感(responsive and sensitive)。由此可推断出“静止面部实验”的目的是要求父母对孩子们的情感需求做出回应,因此选择D项。

错项排除:文章指出孩子会对空洞的表情感到苦恼,因此A项错误。原文没有论述言语表达和情感交流之间的关系,因此排除B项。原文第三段第三句指出,母亲表情发生变化时,孩子是有所察觉和反映的,因此C项错误。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:28. Radesky cites the “still face experiment” to s

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share