刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

    With so much focus on children’s use of screens, it’s easy for parents to forget about their own screen use. “Tech is designed to really suck on you in,” says Jenny Radesky in her study of digital play, “and digital products are there to promote maximal engagement. It makes it hard to disengage, and leads to a lot of bleed-over into the family routine.”

    Radesky has studied the use of mobile phones and tablets at mealtimes by giving mother-child pairs a food-testing exercise. She found that mothers who used devices during the exercise started 20 percent fewer verbal and 39 percent fewer nonverbal interactions with their children. During a separate observation, she saw that phones became a source of tension in the family. Parents would be looking at their emails while the children would be making excited bids for their attention.

    Infants are wired to look at parents’ faces to try to understand their world, and if those faces are blank and unresponsive—as they often are when absorbed in a device—it can be extremely disconcerting for the children. Radesky cites the “still face experiment” devised by developmental psychologist Ed Tronick in the 1970s. In it, a mother is asked to interact with her child in a normal way before putting on a blank expression and not giving them any visual social feedback: the child becomes increasingly distressed as she tries to capture her mother’s attention. “Parents don’t have to be exquisitely parents at all times, but there needs to be a balance and parents need to be responsive and sensitive to a child’s verbal or nonverbal expressions of an emotional need,” says Radesky.

    On the other hand, Tronick himself is concerned that the worries about kids’ use of screens are born out of an “oppressive ideology that demands that parents should always be interacting” with their children: “It’s based on a somewhat fantasized, very white, very upper-middle-class ideology that says if you’re failing to expose your child to 30,000 words you are neglecting them.” Tronick believes that just because a child isn’t learning from the screen doesn’t mean there’s no value to it—particularly if it gives parents time to have a shower, do housework or simply have a break from their child. Parents, he says, can get a lot out of using their devices to speak to a friend or get some work out of the way. This can make them feel happier, which lets them be more available to their child the rest of the time.

29. The oppressive ideology mentioned by Tronick requires parents to ________.

A
protect kids from exposure to wild fantasies
B
teach their kids at least 30,000 words a year
C
ensure constant interaction with their children
D
remain concerned about kids’ use of screens
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

C

解析:

答案精析:根据题干中的oppressive ideology和requires parents可定位至文章第四段第一句。根据定位句可知,关于孩子使用电子设备的焦虑是来自一种“具有压抑性的意识形态,该理念要求父母应该与孩子一直保持互动”。由此可知,特罗尼克提出的压制性意识形态要求父母确保孩子之间经常互动,原文中always be interacting对应C项中的constant interaction,因此选择C项。

错项排除:文章提及这种意识形态具有想象性,但并未说明保护孩子不受疯狂幻想的影响,故排除A项。原文提及三万个词汇,但并未说明每年教孩子至少三万个词汇,故排除B项。原文并没有说父母要对孩子使用电子产品担心,事实上孩子使用电子产品也会给父母带来好处,D项与原文相悖,故排除。

长难句分析:On the other hand, Tronick himself is concerned that the worries about kids’ use of screens are born out of an “oppressive ideology that demands that parents should always be interacting” with their children.

本句为复合句,On the other hand为插入语,表示转折。主句部分为Tronick himself is concerned,其后跟宾语从句that the worries about kids’ use of screens are born out of an “oppressive ideology;而宾语从句中包含定语从句that demands…修饰ideology,和宾语从句that parents should always be interacting” with their children,作demands的宾语。

句意为:另一方面,特罗尼克本人担心,关于孩子使用电子设备的焦虑是来自一种“具有压抑性的意识形态”,该理念要求父母应该与孩子一直保持互动。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:29. The oppressive ideology mentioned by Tronick r

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share