刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

    With so much focus on children’s use of screens, it’s easy for parents to forget about their own screen use. “Tech is designed to really suck on you in,” says Jenny Radesky in her study of digital play, “and digital products are there to promote maximal engagement. It makes it hard to disengage, and leads to a lot of bleed-over into the family routine.”

    Radesky has studied the use of mobile phones and tablets at mealtimes by giving mother-child pairs a food-testing exercise. She found that mothers who used devices during the exercise started 20 percent fewer verbal and 39 percent fewer nonverbal interactions with their children. During a separate observation, she saw that phones became a source of tension in the family. Parents would be looking at their emails while the children would be making excited bids for their attention.

    Infants are wired to look at parents’ faces to try to understand their world, and if those faces are blank and unresponsive—as they often are when absorbed in a device—it can be extremely disconcerting for the children. Radesky cites the “still face experiment” devised by developmental psychologist Ed Tronick in the 1970s. In it, a mother is asked to interact with her child in a normal way before putting on a blank expression and not giving them any visual social feedback: the child becomes increasingly distressed as she tries to capture her mother’s attention. “Parents don’t have to be exquisitely parents at all times, but there needs to be a balance and parents need to be responsive and sensitive to a child’s verbal or nonverbal expressions of an emotional need,” says Radesky.

    On the other hand, Tronick himself is concerned that the worries about kids’ use of screens are born out of an “oppressive ideology that demands that parents should always be interacting” with their children: “It’s based on a somewhat fantasized, very white, very upper-middle-class ideology that says if you’re failing to expose your child to 30,000 words you are neglecting them.” Tronick believes that just because a child isn’t learning from the screen doesn’t mean there’s no value to it—particularly if it gives parents time to have a shower, do housework or simply have a break from their child. Parents, he says, can get a lot out of using their devices to speak to a friend or get some work out of the way. This can make them feel happier, which lets them be more available to their child the rest of the time.

30. According to Tronick, kids’ use of screens may ________.

A
give their parents some free time
B
make their parents more creative
C
help them with their homework
D
help them become more attentive
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

A

解析:

答案精析:根据题干中的Tronick和kids’ use of screens可定位至第四段第二句。根据定位句可知,特罗尼克认为,即使孩子们不能从屏幕里学到东西,不代表它没有价值,尤其是如果它让父母有时间洗澡、做家务或者从照顾孩子中得到休息。由此可知,孩子们使用电子设备会让他们的父母有一些自由的时间。因此选择A项。

错项排除:文章并未指出父母的创造力是否与使用电子设备有关,因此排除B项。原文提及让父母有时间做家务,并未说明使用电子设备会帮助他们做作业,因此C项错误。原文并未提及孩子使用电子设备与注意力之间的关系,因此排除D项。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:30. According to Tronick, kids’ use of screens may

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share