刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

    That everyone’s too busy these days is a cliché. But one specific complaint is made especially mournfully: There’s never any time to read.

    What makes the problem thornier is that the usual time-management techniques don’t seem sufficient. The web’s full of articles offering tips on making time to read: “Give up TV” or “Carry a book with you at all times.” But in my experience, using such methods to free up the odd 30 minutes doesn’t work. Sit down to read and the flywheel of work-related thoughts keeps spinning—or else you’re so exhausted that a challenging book’s the last thing you need. The modern mind, Tim Parks, a novelist and critic, writes, “is overwhelmingly inclined toward communication… It is not simply that one is interrupted; it is that one is actually inclined to interruption.” Deep reading requires not just time, but a special kind of time which can’t be obtained merely by becoming more efficient.

    In fact, “becoming more efficient” is part of the problem. Thinking of time as a resource to be maximised means you approach it instrumentally, judging any given moment as well spent only in so far as it advances progress toward some goal. Immersive reading, by contrast, depends on being willing to risk inefficiency, goallessness, even time-wasting. Try to slot it as a to-do list item and you’ll manage only goal-focused reading—useful sometimes, but not the most fulfilling kind. “The future comes at us like empty bottles along an unstoppable and nearly infinite conveyor belt,” writes Gary Eberle in his book Sacred Time, and “we feel a pressure to fill these different-sized bottles (days, hours, minutes) as they pass, for if they get by without being filled, we will have wasted them”. No mind-set could be worse for losing yourself in a book.

    So what does work? Perhaps surprisingly, scheduling regular times for reading. You’d think this might fuel the efficiency mind-set, but in fact, Eberle notes, such ritualistic behaviour helps us “step outside time’s flow” into “soul time.” You could limit distractions by reading only physical books, or on single-purpose e-readers. “Carry a book with you at all times” can actually work, too—providing you dip in often enough, so that reading becomes the default state from which you temporarily surface to take care of business, before dropping back down. On a really good day, it no longer feels as if you’re “making time to read,” but just reading, and making time for everything else.

31. The usual time-management techniques don’t work because ________.

A
what they can offer does not ease the modern mind
B
what challenging books demand is repetitive reading
C
what people often forget is carrying a book with them
D
what deep reading requires cannot be guaranteed
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

D

解析:

答案精析:根据题干中的usual time-management techniques和don’t work可定位至第二段。根据第二段可知,常见的时间管理技巧不够充足,作者认为这些方法不奏效,随后具体解释了这些方法不奏效的原因——人们挤出时间阅读,却不在状态,而深度阅读需要的不仅仅是时间,还需要阅读状态。由此可知,挤出时间阅读的方法不能满足人们深度阅读所需的条件,因此选择D项。

错项排除:根据文章第五句中的The modern mind可知,现代人喜欢干扰,但是并未提及时间管理方法对其的影响,因此排除A项。B项与题干无关,故排除。C项是对时间管理技巧的举例,不能推测出人们时常忘记随身携带书籍,故排除C项。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:31. The usual time-management techniques don’t wor

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share