刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

    Though not biologically related, friends are as “related” as fourth cousins, sharing about 1% of genes. That is (1) _____ a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has (2) _____ .

The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted (3) _____ 1,932 unique subjects which (4)_____ pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both (5) _____ .

    While 1% may seem (6) _____, it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics at UC San Diego, says, “Most people do not even (7) _____ their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who (8) _____ our kin.”

    The study (9) _____ found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes for immunity. Why this similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for now. (10) _____, as the team suggests, it draws us to similar environments but there is more (11) _____ it. There could be many mechanisms working together that (12) _____ us in choosing genetically similar friends (13) _____ “functional kinship” of being friends with (14) _____!

    One of the remarkable findings of the study was that the similar genes seem to be evolving (15) _____ than other genes. Studying this could help (16) _____ why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years, with social environment being a major (17) _____ factor.

    The findings do not simply explain people’s (18) _____ to befriend those of similar (19) _____ backgrounds, say the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, care was taken to (20) _____ that all subjects, friends and strangers, were taken from the same population.

(2)

A
defended
B
concluded
C
withdrawn
D
advised
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

B

解析:

答案精析:动词辨析题。根据空格所在句的前后内容可知,That is 中的that指第一句话的内容(朋友之间的基因有相关性),has 作表语从句的谓语。第二句中的插入语说明了研究的出处,显然这里指的是该研究的结论,故本空应填入concluded。

错项排除:本文开头就说明了一项研究的结论是怎样的,在之后并未描述有其他相反的论点或看法,所以不存在为之辩护这一说法,故排除A项。根据全文大意可知,文章始终在对朋友间的基因联系进行说明,C项不符合原文语义,故排除。朋友间有相似基因的发现是经过一系列的研究而得出的结论,不应作为建议或者提议,故排除D项。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接: (2)

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share