刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

    Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on this educational ritual. Unfortunately, L.A. Unified has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

    This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot complete on their own or that they cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

    District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling; teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

    At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district finds homework to be unimportant to its students’ academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework matters, it should account for a significant portion of the grade. Meanwhile, this policy does nothing to ensure that the homework students receive is meaningful or appropriate to their age and the subject, or that teachers are not assigning more than they are willing to review and correct.

    The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for L.A. Unified to do homework right.

25. A suitable title for this text could be ________.

A
A Faulty Approach to Homework
B
A Welcomed Policy for Poor Students
C
Thorny Questions about Homework
D
Wrong Interpretation of an Educational Policy
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

A

解析:

答案精析:全文围绕一项家庭作业的新政策进行展开,大部分篇幅都在批评该政策的不足与可能带来的不良后果,可见正确答案为A选项。

错项排除:原文只是提到该政策旨在解决贫困学生做作业时遇到的困难,并未提及是否受贫困学生欢迎,故B选项错误。关于家庭作业的棘手问题是新政策未解决的问题,属于文章细节信息,不能作为文章的标题,故C选项也应排除。文章是对教育政策的解读,全文在批评该政策的不足,语调客观,不能判断文章解读有误,故D选项错误。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:25. A suitable title for this text could be ______

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share