刷题刷出新高度,偷偷领先!偷偷领先!偷偷领先! 关注我们,悄悄成为最优秀的自己!

单选题

    Martha Stewart was charged, tried and convicted of a crime in 2004. As she neared the end of her prison sentence, a well-known columnist wrote that she was “paying her dues,” and that “there is simply no reason for anyone to attempt to deny her right to start anew.”

    Surely, the American ideal of second chances should not be reserved only for the rich and powerful. Unfortunately, many federal and state laws impose post-conviction restrictions on a shockingly large number of Americans, who are prevented from ever fully paying their debt to society.

    At least 65 million people in the United States have a criminal record. This can result in severe penalties that continue long after punishment is completed.

    Many of these penalties are imposed regardless of the seriousness of the offense or the person’s individual circumstances. Laws can restrict or ban voting, access to public housing, and professional and business licensing. They can affect a person’s ability to get a job and qualification for benefits.

    In all, more than 45,000 laws and rules serve to exclude vast numbers of people from fully participating in American life.

    Some laws make sense. No one advocates letting someone convicted of pedophilia (恋童癖) work in a school. But too often collateral (随附的) consequences bear no relation to public safety. Should a woman who possessed a small amount of drugs years ago be permanently unable to be licensed as a nurse?

    These laws are also counterproductive, since they make it harder for people with criminal records to find housing or land a job, two key factors that reduce backsliding.

    A recent report makes several recommendations, including the abolition of most post-conviction penalties, except for those specifically needed to protect public safety. Where the penalties are not a must, they should be imposed only if the facts of a case support it.

    The point is not to excuse or forget the crime. Rather, it is to recognize that in America’s vast criminal justice system, second chances are crucial. It is in no one’s interest to keep a large segment of the population on the margins of society.

54. What does the author think of the post-conviction laws and rules?

A
They help to maintain social stability.
B
Some of them have long been outdated.
C
They are hardly understood by the public.
D
A lot of them have negative effects on society.
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题,轻松应对考试!

答案:

D

解析:

54.D) A lot of them have negative effects on society.

解析:观点态度题,问到作者对于这些刑满后的限制的法律的态度,六段七段均表达了作者的看法,第六段说一些法律起到了效果,第七段These laws are also counterproductive, since they make it harder for people with criminal records to find housing or land a job, two key factors that reduce backsliding.这些法律同样也会产生相反的效果,因为对于有犯罪记录的人来说,找房子或者工作都有难度,而房子和工作正是使他们避免重蹈覆辙的重要因素。因此,作者并不认同一些法律和法规,觉得这些法律和法规对有犯罪记录的人不公平,对社会造成了负面影响。因此选D。

创作类型:
原创

本文链接:54. What does the author think of the post-convict

版权声明:本站点所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。

让学习像火箭一样快速,微信扫码,获取考试解析、体验刷题服务,开启你的学习加速器!

分享考题
share