刷题刷出新高度，偷偷领先！偷偷领先！偷偷领先！ 关注我们，悄悄成为最优秀的自己！
单选题
Any fair-minded assessment of the dangers of the deal between Britain’s National Health Service (NHS)and DeepMind must start by acknowledging that both sides mean well.DeepMind is one of the leading artificial intelligence(AI) companies in the world．The potential of this work applied to health-care is very great,but it could also lead to further concentration of power in the tech giants．It is against that background that the information commissioner,Elizabeth Denham,has issued her damning verdict against the Royal Free hospital trust under the NHS，which handed over to DeepMind the records of 1.6 million patients in 2015 on the basis of a vague agreement which took far too little account of the patients’ rights and their expectations of privacy．
DeepMind has almost apologized.The NHS trust has mended its ways.Further arrangements—and there may be many—between the NHS and DeepMind will be carefully scrutinised to ensure that all necessary permissions have been asked of patients and all unnecessary data has been cleaned.There are lessons about informed patient consent to learn.But privacy is not the only angle in this case and not even the most important.Ms Denham chose to concentrate the blame on the NHS trust,since under existing law it“controlled”the data and DeepMind merely‘'processed”it．But this distinction misses the point that it is processing and aggregation,not the mere possession of bits,that gives the data value.
The great question is who should benefit from the analysis of all the data that our lives now generate.Privacy law builds on the concept of damage to an individual from identifiable knowledge about them.That misses the way the surveillance economy works.The data of an individual there gains its value only when it is compared with the data of countless millions more.
The use of privacy law to curb the tech giants in this instance feels slightly maladapted.This practice does not address the real worry.It is not enough to say that the algorithms DeepMind develops will benefit patients and save lives．What matters is that they will belong to a private monopoly which developed them using public resources.If software promises to save lives on the scale that drugs now can,big data may be expected to behave as a big pharma has done.We are still at the beginning of this revolution and small choices now may turn out to have gigantic consequences later.A long struggle will be needed to avoid a future of digital feudalism.Ms Denham’s report is a welcome start.
What is true of the agreement between the NHS and DeepMind?
A
B
C
D
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题，轻松应对考试！
答案：
解析：
根据题干中的关键信息，NHS和DeepMind之间的协议在处理患者隐私方面存在缺陷。文章提到这个协议忽视了患者的权利和对隐私的期望，伊丽莎白·德纳姆对该协议进行了严厉的批评。因此，正确答案是B，即这个协议没有充分考虑到患者的权利。
创作类型：
原创
本文链接：What is true of the agreement between the NHS and
版权声明：本站点所有文章除特别声明外，均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。让学习像火箭一样快速，微信扫码，获取考试解析、体验刷题服务，开启你的学习加速器！
分享考题 
