刷题刷出新高度，偷偷领先！偷偷领先！偷偷领先！ 关注我们，悄悄成为最优秀的自己！
单选题
The McClatchy newspaper chain's recent filing for bankruptcy is one more data point showing that US journalism is dying. While several big national papers like the New York Times are healthy, more typical are the closures, bankruptcies, and extreme downsizing that increasingly leave cities, towns and rural communities without local news.
This slaughter has attracted opportunistic pathologies, from hedge funds buying up distressed papers and selling them for parts, to news outlets resorting to increasingly dubious forms of advertising and clickbait. A degraded product gives readers even less reason to support local news. Meanwhile, little evidence suggests that any new market-driven model can rescue newspapers or sustain the journalism that democracy requires. The market has failed us.
With market failure, journalism's survival requires public options. We can collect ideas from our history and from around the world for how best to support the necessary public infrastructure that journalism needs to survive.
These policies include tax incentives that could transition struggling newspapers into not-for-profit status and direct subsidies to create new digital startups, municipal newspapers and news cooperatives. Others hope that generous billionaires will save the day. But tackling the journalism crisis at a systemic level—bringing nutrition to "news deserts" where rich givers and foundations are unlikely to go—requires a large public media fund.
Major foundations could pool their money and help develop a new public media system. Given Americans' fondness for it, invoking the BBC is useful to expand our political imagination for what's possible. But any new US system should be truly public—publicly owned and democratically governed with constant community input.
State governments should be doing more as well. New Jersey recently funded a "civic information consortium" to help provide local news. Such government funding could be paired with organizing community newsrooms and engaging residents during all stages of media production. This model might inspire a new kind of journalism.
While large audiences won't simply materialize overnight, local communities creating their own media may build trust and voters over time. All foundational democratic theories—including the first amendment itsell—assume a functional press system. The fourth estate's current collapse is a profound social problem. We desperately need a national conversation about what society should do about it. This crisis is also an opportunity to reimagine what journalism could and should be.
Ultimately, we face a stark choice: either we make public investments in journalism, or we accept a future in which entire regions and communities lack local news media. If we hope for any semblance of democracy, the correct path forward should be obvious.
It can be learned from the first two paragraphs that struggling newspapers are
A
B
C
D
使用微信搜索喵呜刷题，轻松应对考试！
答案：
解析：
：文章第二段提到，“几乎没有证据显示新的市场驱动模式能够拯救报纸或维持民主所需的新闻业”，这表明在市场机制下，报纸不太可能复兴。因此，选项D“不太可能在市场机制下复兴”是正确的回答。
创作类型：
原创
本文链接：It can be learned from the first two paragraphs th
版权声明：本站点所有文章除特别声明外，均采用 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议。转载请注明文章出处。让学习像火箭一样快速，微信扫码，获取考试解析、体验刷题服务，开启你的学习加速器！
分享考题 
