题目：阅读下列说明，回答问题。【说明】某高校开发了一套基于Web的教务管理系统，实现教务管理人员课程设置、学生选课和成绩查询、教师上传成绩以及特殊情况下教务处对成绩进行修改等功能。系统基于Java EE平台实现，采用表单(Form)实现用户数据的提交并与用户交互。系统要支持：7在特定时期内100个用户并发时，主要功能的处理能力至少要达到10个请求/秒，平均数据量8KB/请求；8用户可以通过不同的移动设备、操作系统和浏览器进行访问。简要叙述教务管理系统表单测试的主要测试内容。

题目：阅读下列说明，回答问题。【说明】某软件公司为某银行设计开发了一套网上银行系统，该系统提供基本的支付、查询、转账和信息修改等功能。银行对网上银行系统提出了初步的性能指标：4交易响应时间不超过2s5并发用户数＞=10006CPU利用率不超过80%7系统需要7*24小时不间断的稳定运行8每秒事务数为79交易成功率为100%现需要对该软件进行性能测试。在测试性能指标(5)时，该软件公司在客户端模拟大量并发用户来执行业务操作，统计平均的每秒事务数。该软件公司认为客户端接收响应信息与该性能指标的测试无关，因此在模拟客户端上发起正常业务申请，接收系统响应后直接丢弃响应信息，没有进行功能校验。请说明该软件公司的做法正确与否，并简要说明原因以及执行功能校验的副作用。

题目：【老版知识点】阅读下列说明，回答问题。【说明】某软件公司为某银行设计开发了一套网上银行系统，该系统提供基本的支付、查询、转账和信息修改等功能。银行对网上银行系统提出了初步的性能指标：4交易响应时间不超过2s5并发用户数＞=10006CPU利用率不超过80%7系统需要7*24小时不间断的稳定运行8每秒事务数为79交易成功率为100%现需要对该软件进行性能测试。性能测试中，针对一个单独的性能指标，往往需要采用多种不同的测试方法。该软件公司需要测试性能指标(1)和(5)，设计了如下的测试方案：测试常规情况下的并发用户数，逐步增加并发用户数，分别测试：(1)在响应时间为2s时，系统所能承受的最大并发访问用户的数量：(2)系统在多大的并发访问用户数量下，响应时间不可接受(例如超过2s)。请指出这两项测试分别属于哪种类型的测试，并分别解释这两种测试类型的基本概念。

题目：阅读下列说明，回答问题。【说明】某软件公司为某银行设计开发了一套网上银行系统，该系统提供基本的支付、查询、转账和信息修改等功能。银行对网上银行系统提出了初步的性能指标：（1）交易响应时间不超过2s（2）并发用户数＞=1000（3）CPU利用率不超过80%（4）系统需要7*24小时不间断的稳定运行（5）每秒事务数为7（6）交易成功率为100%现需要对该软件进行性能测试。常见的性能测试包括负载测试、压力测试、并发性能测试、疲劳强度测试和大数据量测试等。针对题目中所述的6个性能指标，并发性能测试和疲劳强度测试所涉及的指标各有哪些?

题目：阅读下列说明，回答问题。 【说明】逻辑覆盖法是设计白盒测试用例的主要方法之一，通过对程序逻辑结构的遍历实现程序的覆盖。针对以下由C语言编写的程序，按要求回答问题。 请给出问题2中控制流图的线性无关路径。

题目：阅读下列说明，回答问题。【说明】逻辑覆盖法是设计白盒测试用例的主要方法之一，通过对程序逻辑结构的遍历实现程序的覆盖。针对以下由C语言编写的程序，按要求回答问题。int XOR(char * filename,unsigned long key){     FILE * input = NULL , *output =  NULL;   //i     char * outfilename = NULL;     int len = strlen(filename);     unsigned char buffer;     if( (filename[len-2] == '.') && (filename[len-1] == 'c') ) { //2,3     outfilename = new char[len+1];  //4     strcpy(outfilename, filename);     outfilename[len-2] = '\0';     }     else{   //5     outfilename = new char[len+5];     strcpy(outfilename, filename);     strncat(outfilename,".c",2);     }     input =  fopen(filename,"rb");     if( input == NULL) {   //6       cout ＜＜ "Error opening file " ＜＜ filename ＜＜ endl;  //7     delete [] outfilename;     outfilename = NULL;     return 1;     }     output =  fopen(outfilename,"wb");     if( output == NULL ) {   //8     cout ＜＜ "Error creating output file " ＜＜ outfilename ＜＜ endl;  //9     delete [] outfilename;     outfilename = NULL;     return 1;     }     while( ! feof(input) ) {  //10     if(fread(&buffer,sizeof(unsigned char),1,input) != 1 ) {   //11     if( ! feof(input) ) {   //12     delete [] outfilename;  //13     outfilename = NULL;     fclose(input);     fclose(output);     return 1;     }     }     else{   //14     buffer ^= key;     fwrite(&buffer,sizeof(unsigned char),1,output);     }     }     fclose(input);   //15     fclose(output);     delete [] outfilename;     return 0;     }请画出上述程序的控制流图，并计算其控制流图的环路复杂度VG。

题目：阅读下列说明，回答问题。【说明】逻辑覆盖法是设计白盒测试用例的主要方法之一，通过对程序逻辑结构的遍历实现程序的覆盖。针对以下由C语言编写的程序，按要求回答问题。int XOR(char * filename,unsigned long key){     FILE * input = NULL , *output =  NULL;   //i     char * outfilename = NULL;     int len = strlen(filename);     unsigned char buffer;     if( (filename[len-2] == '.') && (filename[len-1] == 'c') ) { //2,3     outfilename = new char[len+1];  //4     strcpy(outfilename, filename);     outfilename[len-2] = '\0';     }     else{   //5     outfilename = new char[len+5];     strcpy(outfilename, filename);     strncat(outfilename,".c",2);     }     input =  fopen(filename,"rb");     if( input == NULL) {   //6       cout ＜＜ "Error opening file " ＜＜ filename ＜＜ endl;  //7     delete [] outfilename;     outfilename = NULL;     return 1;     }     output =  fopen(outfilename,"wb");     if( output == NULL ) {   //8     cout ＜＜ "Error creating output file " ＜＜ outfilename ＜＜ endl;  //9     delete [] outfilename;     outfilename = NULL;     return 1;     }     while( ! feof(input) ) {  //10     if(fread(&buffer,sizeof(unsigned char),1,input) != 1 ) {   //11     if( ! feof(input) ) {   //12     delete [] outfilename;  //13     outfilename = NULL;     fclose(input);     fclose(output);     return 1;     }     }     else{   //14     buffer ^= key;     fwrite(&buffer,sizeof(unsigned char),1,output);     }     }     fclose(input);   //15     fclose(output);     delete [] outfilename;     return 0;     }请给出满足100%DC(判定覆盖)所需的逻辑条件。

题目：There is nothing in this world constant but inconstancy. -SWIFTProject after project designs a set of algorithms and then plunges into construction of customer-deliverable software on a schedule that demands delivery of the first thing built.In most projects, the first system built is（ ）usable. It may be too slow, too big, awkward to use, or all three. There is no（ ）but to start again, smarting but smarter, and build a redesigned version in which these problems are solved. The discard and（）may be done in one lump, or it may be done piece-by-piece. But all large-system experience shows that it will be done. Where a new system concept or new technology is used, one has to build a system to throw away, for even the best planning is not so omniscient (全知的) as to get it right the first time.The management question, therefore, is not whether to build a pilot system and throw it away. You will do that. The only question is whether to plan in advance to build a （ ）, or to promise to deliver the throwaway to customers. Seen this way, the answer is much clearer. Delivering that throwaway to customers buys time, but it does SO only at the（请作答此空）of agony (极大痛苦) for the user, distraction for the builders while they do the redesign, and a bad reputation for the product that the best redesign will find hard to live down.Hence plan to throw one away; you will, anyhow.

题目：There is nothing in this world constant but inconstancy. -SWIFTProject after project designs a set of algorithms and then plunges into construction of customer-deliverable software on a schedule that demands delivery of the first thing built.In most projects, the first system built is（ ）usable. It may be too slow, too big, awkward to use, or all three. There is no（ ）but to start again, smarting but smarter, and build a redesigned version in which these problems are solved. The discard and（）may be done in one lump, or it may be done piece-by-piece. But all large-system experience shows that it will be done. Where a new system concept or new technology is used, one has to build a system to throw away, for even the best planning is not so omniscient (全知的) as to get it right the first time.The management question, therefore, is not whether to build a pilot system and throw it away. You will do that. The only question is whether to plan in advance to build a （请作答此空）, or to promise to deliver the throwaway to customers. Seen this way, the answer is much clearer. Delivering that throwaway to customers buys time, but it does SO only at the（ ）of agony (极大痛苦) for the user, distraction for the builders while they do the redesign, and a bad reputation for the product that the best redesign will find hard to live down.Hence plan to throw one away; you will, anyhow.

题目：There is nothing in this world constant but inconstancy. -SWIFTProject after project designs a set of algorithms and then plunges into construction of customer-deliverable software on a schedule that demands delivery of the first thing built.In most projects, the first system built is（ ）usable. It may be too slow, too big, awkward to use, or all three. There is no（ ）but to start again, smarting but smarter, and build a redesigned version in which these problems are solved. The discard and（请作答此空）may be done in one lump, or it may be done piece-by-piece. But all large-system experience shows that it will be done. Where a new system concept or new technology is used, one has to build a system to throw away, for even the best planning is not so omniscient (全知的) as to get it right the first time.The management question, therefore, is not whether to build a pilot system and throw it away. You will do that. The only question is whether to plan in advance to build a ______, or to promise to deliver the throwaway to customers. Seen this way, the answer is much clearer. Delivering that throwaway to customers buys time, but it does SO only at the（ ）of agony (极大痛苦) for the user, distraction for the builders while they do the redesign, and a bad reputation for the product that the best redesign will find hard to live down.Hence plan to throw one away; you will, anyhow.